The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Land sparing is crucial for urban ecosystem services
Open accessAbstract
The world's cities must grow to accommodate an increasing urban population, and achieving this with minimal impact on ecosystem structures and functions is a major challenge. At opposite ends of a possible development spectrum are “land sharing” – extensive sprawling urbanization where built land and natural space are interspersed – and “land sparing” – intensive and extremely compact urbanization alongside separate, large, contiguous green space. Using case studies across urbanization gradients, we demonstrate that land sparing is crucial for sustaining a majority of ecosystem services. Conversely, some land sharing may also be necessary to ensure that people benefit from urban green space. Future urban development should carefully consider green space provision, to maximize the services provided by urban ecosystems. This can be achieved by optimizing distributions of development intensity across cities by means of top‐down, policy‐led approaches.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gardens are accessible spaces for all kinds of people, including children, elderly people, and those with a disability, and are relatively easily and quickly implemented in urban areas as a 'land-sharing' strategy.
“Because gardens are accessible spaces for all kinds of people, including children, elderly people, and those with a disability, and relatively easily and quickly implemented in urban areas as a “land-sharing” strategy (Soga et al., 2015, Stott et al., 2015)”
From Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Stott et al., 2015
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 139
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01666.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0610172104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.025 · DOI
- 10.1111/conl.12084 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1365-2664.12087 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315024899 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1106049 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.005 · DOI
- 10.3386/w7503 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2664.12118 · DOI · Paper page
- MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005, Summary for decision makers
- 10.1007/s10980-008-9253-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1641/B571005 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1208742 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.008 · DOI
- RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects), 2013, City health check: how design can save lives and money
- 10.1017/CBO9780511522192.005 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0023777 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.003 · DOI
- UNEP–WCMC (United Nations Environment Programme–World Conservation Monitoring Centre), 2007, The UK national ecosystem assessment technical report
Metadata
- Authors
- Stott, I., Soga, M., Inger, R., & Gaston, K. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Hokkaido University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Gaston, Kevin J
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 387-393
- ISSN
- 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9309
- OpenAlex
- W2138912520
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 12.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I002154/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
- Keywords
- land sparing, land sharing, urban ecosystem services, urban sprawl, urban green space, urban development intensity, green space provision, urban-rural gradient, urban planning policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review