Cited by 3,847Ecosystem dynamics and resilienceSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management

Open access
Folke, Carl, Carpenter, Steve, Walker, Brian, Scheffer, Marten, Elmqvist, Thomas, Gunderson, Lance, Holling, C.S.·2004·Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Abstract

▪ Abstract We review the evidence of regime shifts in terrestrial and aquatic environments in relation to resilience of complex adaptive ecosystems and the functional roles of biological diversity in this context. The evidence reveals that the likelihood of regime shifts may increase when humans reduce resilience by such actions as removing response diversity, removing whole functional groups of species, or removing whole trophic levels; impacting on ecosystems via emissions of waste and pollutants and climate change; and altering the magnitude, frequency, and duration of disturbance regimes. The combined and often synergistic effects of those pressures can make ecosystems more vulnerable to changes that previously could be absorbed. As a consequence, ecosystems may suddenly shift from desired to less desired states in their capacity to generate ecosystem services. Active adaptive management and governance of resilience will be required to sustain desired ecosystem states and transform degraded ecosystems into fundamentally new and more desirable configurations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When alternative states become stabilized, ecosystems will not recover fully without mitigation of altered feedbacks.

    “When alternative states become stabilized, ecosystems will not recover fully without mitigation of altered feedbacks (Beisner et al. 2003, Folke et al. 2004, Suding et al. 2004).”

    From WATER TABLES CONSTRAIN HEIGHT RECOVERY OF WILLOW ON YELLOWSTONE'S NORTHERN RANGE (2008) · cites this paper as Folke et al. 2004

    The available passages labeled Abstract contain keywords and citation metadata, but no discussion of whether stabilized alternative states prevent full recovery without mitigating altered feedbacks. Searches for recovery, alternative states, and feedbacks found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (SE)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Emory University (US)
  • 16871 Sturgis Circle, Cedar Key, Florida 32625;
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
Published
2004-12-15
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
557-581
ISSN
  • 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2069
OpenAlex
W2142289369
Cited by
3,847
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 200 · 2025: 188 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 200 · 2022: 202 · 2021: 215 · 2020: 196 · 2019: 245 · 2018: 238 · 2017: 208 · 2016: 249 · 2015: 243 · 2014: 204 · 2013: 215 · 2012: 200
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (publishedVersion)
  • Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
tipping points, ecosystem resilience, biodiversity, ecosystem management, complex adaptive systems, functional diversity, trophic levels, disturbance regimes, ecosystem services, adaptive management, ecosystem governance, ecosystem degradation, climate change, pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review