CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and Trauma

Abused women with children or children of abused women? A study of conflicting perspectives at women's refuges in Norway

Øverlien, Carolina·2011·Child & Family Social Work
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00715.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Women's refuges were established in Norway in the late 1970s by and for women. From the very outset, abused women have also brought their children to the refuges. With an increasing political, practical and research focus on the situation of children exposed to violence, the Norwegian refuge movement today is expected to apply both the woman's and the child's perspective in their work. By analysing the discourse of children staying at women's refuges, this paper discusses and sheds light on situations where the two perspectives come into conflict and the implications of these conflicts for the children and for the women's refuge movement as a whole.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00715.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children's experiences and voices are underrepresented in academic literature and professional practice around domestic violence and abuse.

    “Children's experiences and voices are underrepresented in academic literature and professional practice around domestic violence and abuse.”

    From Beyond “Witnessing”: Children’s Experiences of Coercive Control in Domestic Violence and Abuse (2018) · cites this paper as Øverlien, 2011

  • There is a need to shift from the passive framing of children as witnesses to a more complex understanding of them as both victims and agents, through understanding how children make sense of and work with their experiences of domestic violence.

    “Some researchers have pointed out the need to shift from this passive framing of children as it ess to a o e o ple u de sta di g of the as oth i ti s a d as age ts, th ough an understanding of how children make sense of and work with their experiences of domestic violence (Øverlien, 2011;Øverlien and Hydén, 2009;Mullender et al., 2003;Authors et al., 2016b;Authors, 2015).”

    From Children’s embodied experience of living with domestic violence: “I’d go into my panic, and shake, really bad” (2016) · cites this paper as Øverlien, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Øverlien, C.
Venue
Child & Family Social Work
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-19
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
71-80
ISSN
1356-7500 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00715.x
OpenAlex
W1728920601
Cited by
39
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 1717 d)
Locations
Child & Family Social Work (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
women's shelters, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, children exposed to violence, children's perspectives, women's perspectives, conflicting perspectives, discourse analysis, Norway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review