The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This could be due to the reason that students with high self-efficacy are more able to execute behaviors that are necessary to produce a specific performance (Bandura et al., 1999).”
From A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022) · cites this paper as Bandura et al., 1999
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
Self-citationEfficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 · Cited by 9,916
Handbook of Positive Psychology
(2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195135336.001.0001 · Cited by 9,158
Metadata
- Authors
- Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Springer Publishing Company
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 158-166
- ISSN
- 0889-8391 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-887X
- OpenAlex
- W1562208008
- Cited by
- 46,835
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 291 · 2025: 1868 · 2024: 1984 · 2023: 2115 · 2022: 1976 · 2021: 2371 · 2020: 2492 · 2019: 2439 · 2018: 2268 · 2017: 2373 · 2016: 2541 · 2015: 2763 · 2014: 2716 · 2013: 2515 · 2012: 2408
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- self-efficacy, perceived control, self-efficacy theory, cognitive therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
