Cited by 29Nursing Diagnosis and DocumentationHealth Sciences Research and EducationMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Improving quality and efficiency of postpartum hospital education

Open access
Buchko, Barbara L., Gutshall, Connie H., Jordan, Elizabeth T.·2012·The Journal of Perinatal Education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the implementation of an evidence-based, streamlined, education process (comprehensive education booklet, individualized education plan, and integration of education into the clinical pathway) and nurse education to improve the quality and efficiency of postpartum education during hospitalization. A one-group pretest-posttest design was used to measure the quality of discharge teaching for new mothers and efficiency of the education process for registered nurses before and after implementation of an intervention. Results indicated that a comprehensive educational booklet and enhanced documentation can improve efficiency in the patient education process for nurses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/1058-1243.21.4.238

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers found that what was taught during the short hospitalization after birth was not retained and was more than what was needed in that moment.

    “researchers found that what was taught during the short hospitalization after birth was not retained (McCarter-Spaulding & Shea, 2016) and was more than what was needed in that moment (Buchko et al., 2012).”

    From Scoping Review of Postpartum Discharge Education Provided by Nurses (2022) · cites this paper as Buchko et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics & American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2007). Guidelines for perinatal care (6th ed.). Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchko, B. L., Gutshall, C. H., & Jordan, E. T.
Venue
The Journal of Perinatal Education
Published
2012
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
238-247
ISSN
  • 1058-1243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8519
OpenAlex
W1978609244
Cited by
29
References
14
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Perinatal Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
postpartum education, discharge education, patient education, evidence-based nursing, educational booklet, individualized education program, care pathways, nursing education, educational efficiency, maternal health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review