The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of the Emotional Intimacy Scale
Abstract
Although many measures have been developed to capture elements of social support, only a few include an assessment of emotional intimacy. Emotional intimacy involves a perception of closeness to another that allows sharing of personal feelings, accompanied by expectations of understanding, affirmation, and demonstrations of caring. The 5-item Emotional Intimacy Scale (EIS) was developed to assess the emotional intimacy component in one close relationship. A sample of 90 women with rheumatoid arthritis was used to assess the reliability and validity of the scale. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability for a 6-week period were .88 and .85, respectively. To assess construct validity, significant, positive correlations were obtained between the EIS and measures of social support, self-efficacy, perceived health competence, reappraisal coping behaviors, life satisfaction, and positive affect. Significant negative correlations were obtained between the EIS and perceived stress levels, helplessness, negative pain coping behaviors, pain, and fatigue. In support of criterion-related validity, the EIS predicted outcomes from an intervention program. To further assess criterion-related validity, scores on the EIS and helplessness predicted scores on two indicators of psychological well-being that measured positive affect and life satisfaction. The EIS is a brief measure of emotional intimacy with good psychometric properties.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Intimacy with the AI companion was captured using the five-item Emotional Intimacy Scale (Sinclair & Dowdy 2005), which measures perceived acceptance, empathic responsiveness, and depth of disclosure.”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Sinclair & Dowdy 2005
Citations
Cites
Sternberg, R. J. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.119 · Cited by 2,614
The impact of daily stress on health and mood: psychological and social resources as mediators
DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.486 · Cited by 1,621
Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self‐efficacy in people with arthritis
Lorig, K., Chastain, R. L., Ung, E., Shoor, S., & Holman, H. R. (1989) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/anr.1780320107 · Cited by 1,590
Callahan, L. F., Cordray, D. S., Wells, G., & Pincus, T. (1996) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1790090608 · Cited by 111
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Bennett J. B, 2000, Time and intimacy: A new science of personal relationships: LEA's series of personal relationships, 10.4324/9781410601681 · DOI
- 4. B. M DeVellis . (1993 ). Depression in rheumatological diseases . In S. Newman & M. Shipley (Eds.), Bailliere's clinical rheumatology: Psychological aspects of rheumatic disease (pp. 241 -257 ). London: Bailliere Tindall. · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · DOI · Paper page
- Donald C.A, 1978, Social Health, 4
- Goleman D, 1997, Emotional intelligence
- Graves P. L, 1991, Cancer Detection & Prevention, 15, 59
- Hatfield E, 1988, The psychology of love
- Hetherington S. E, 1990, Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 16, 155, 10.1080/01614576.1990.11074987 · DOI
- Lazarus R. S, 1984, Stress, appraisal and coping
- Lin N, 1981, Exploring a structural model of strong ties, support, life events and depression
- Meenan R. F, 1980, Arthritis & Rheumatism, 23, 146, 10.1002/art.1780230203 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327752jpa4605_12 · DOI
- Ornish D, 1998, Love & survival: The scientific basis for the healing power of intimacy
- Orth-Gomer K, 1993, Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 37, 10.1097/00006842-199301000-00007 · DOI
- 18. D Perlman, and B Fehr . (1987 ). The development of intimate relationships . In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 13 -42 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- 19. G. R Pierce . (1994 ). The Quality of Relationships Inventory: Assessing the interpersonal context of social support . In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 247 -266 ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Prager K. J, 1995, The psychology of intimacy
- 21. H. T Reis, and N Collins . (2000 ). Measuring relationship properties and interactions relevant to social support . In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 136 -192 ). New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Russek L. G, 1997, Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 144, 10.1097/00006842-199703000-00005 · DOI
- Schaefer M. T, 1981, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 47, 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1981.tb01351.x · DOI
- Schoenfeld-Smith K, 1996, Arthritis Care & Research, 9, 368, 10.1002/1529-0131(199610)9:5<368::AID-ANR1790090505>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
- Schumm W. R, 1986, Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, 381, 10.2307/352405 · DOI
- Seeman T. E, 1987, Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 341, 10.1097/00006842-198707000-00003 · DOI
- Sexton R. E, 1982, Intimacy
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199808)21:4<315::AID-NUR4>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-6133.14.1.64 · DOI
- Smith C. A, 1997, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 19, 11, 10.1007/BF02883422 · DOI
- Smith M. S, 1995, Health Education Research: Theory & Practice, 10, 51, 10.1093/her/10.1.51 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-6133.13.3.213 · DOI
- Stein M. J, 1988, Journal of Rheumatology, 15, 427
- Tack B, 1990, Arthritis Care and Research, 3, 156
- 10.1037//0022-0167.30.4.573 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_10 · DOI
- Waring E. M, 1983, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 53, 10.1002/1097-4679(198301)39:1<53::AID-JCLP2270390110>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
- 40. R Weiss . (1974 ). The provisions of social relationship . In D. Rubin (Ed.), Doing unto others (pp. 17 -26 ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- 41. Y. R Wood . (1984 ). Social support and social networks: Nature and measurement . In P. McReynolds & G. J. Chelune (Eds.), Advances in psychological assessment , Vol. 6 (pp. 312 -353 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is high sexual desire a risk for women’s relationship and sexual well-being?
Štulhofer, A., Bergeron, S., & Jurin, T. (2016) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1084984 · Cited by 22
Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions
Ciriello, R., Gal, U., & Turel, O. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.12476 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinclair, V. G., & Dowdy, S. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Measurement
- Publisher
- Springer Publishing Company
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-206
- ISSN
- 1061-3749
- 1945-7049
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review