Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of 25 pharmaceutical compounds to Lemna gibba using a seven-day static-renewal test

Brain, Richard A., Johnson, David J., Richards, Sean M., Sanderson, Hans, Sibley, Paul K., Solomon, Keith R.·2004·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

Antibiotics are known to have antichloroplastic properties, but their effects on aquatic higher plants are virtually unknown. In order to address this issue, 25 pharmaceuticals, including 22 antibiotics, were assessed for phytotoxicity to the aquatic higher plant Lemna gibba. A 7-d static-renewal test was used, and plants were treated with 0, 10, 30, 100, 300, and 1,000 μg/L of pharmaceutical-containing growth media. Phytotoxicity was assessed using multiple growth and biochemical endpoints. Effective concentration (EC)50, EC25, and EC10 values as well as tests for significant differences between treatments and controls lowest-observed-effect concentration (LOECs) were calculated for each endpoint. Twelve different classes of antibiotics were assessed; however, only members of the fluoroquinolone, sulfonamide, and tetracycline classes of antibiotics displayed significant phytotoxicity. The most toxic members of each of these classes tested were lomefloxacin, sulfamethoxazole, and chlortetracycline, with wet weight EC25 values of 38, 37, and 114 μg/L, respectively. Injury symptoms were comparatively uniform and consistent among chemical classes while degree of phytotoxicity varied considerably. Both of these criteria varied markedly between classes. Wet mass was consistently the most sensitive endpoint above 100 μg/L; conversely, frond number was the most sensitive below 100 μg/L. Pigment endpoints were significantly less sensitive than growth endpoints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1897/02-576

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Brain, R. A., Johnson, D. J., Richards, S. M., Sanderson, H., Sibley, P. K., & Solomon, K. R.
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2004-02-01
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
371-382
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W2016469373
Cited by
324
References
30
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of 25 pharmaceutical compounds to Lemna gibba using a seven-day static-renewal test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1897/02-576
The paper
Brain, R. A., Johnson, D. J., Richards, S. M., Sanderson, H., Sibley, P. K., & Solomon, K. R. (2004). Effects of 25 pharmaceutical compounds to Lemna gibba using a seven-day static-renewal test. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1897/02-576

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.