The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream
Abstract
Restoration of streams degraded by urbanization has usually been attempted by enhancement of instream habitat or riparian zones. Such restoration approaches are unlikely to substantially improve instream ecological condition because they do not match the scale of the degrading process. Recent studies of urban impacts on streams in Melbourne, Australia, on water chemistry, algal biomass and assemblage composition of diatoms and invertebrates, suggested that the primary degrading process to streams in many urban areas is effective imperviousness (EI), the proportion of a catchment covered by impervious surfaces directly connected to the stream by stormwater drainage pipes. The direct connection of impervious surfaces to streams means that even small rainfall events can produce sufficient surface runoff to cause frequent disturbance through regular delivery of water and pollutants; where impervious surfaces are not directly connected to streams, small rainfall events are intercepted and infiltrated. We, therefore, identified use of alternative drainage methods, which maintain a near-natural frequency of surface runoff from the catchment, as the best approach to stream restoration in urban catchments and then used models of relationships between 14 ecological indicators and EI to determine restoration objectives. Ecological condition, as indicated by concentrations of water-quality variables, algal biomass, and several measures of diatom and macroinvertebrate assemblage composition, declined with increasing EI until a threshold was reached (EI = 0.01–0.14), beyond which no further degradation was observed. We showed, in a sample catchment, that it is possible to redesign the drainage system to reduce EI to a level at which the models predict detectable improvement in most ecological indicators. Distributed, low-impact design measures are required that intercept rainfall from small events and then facilitate its infiltration, evaporation, transpiration, or storage for later in-house use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Streams in the Urban Landscape
Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040 · Cited by 2,795
Streams in the Urban Landscape
Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2008) · Urban Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_12 · Cited by 2,194
The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology
Resh, V. H., Brown, A. V., Covich, A. P., Gurtz, M. E., Li, H. W., Minshall, G. W., Reice, S. R., Sheldon, A. L., Wallace, J. B., & Wissmar, R. C. (1988) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1467300 · Cited by 1,586
Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology
Hobbs, R. J., & Norton, D. A. (1996) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.1996.tb00112.x · Cited by 1,269
PIECEWISE REGRESSION: A TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING ECOLOGICAL THRESHOLDS
Toms, J. D., & Lesperance, M. L. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0472 · Cited by 1,038
WinBUGS user manual version 1.4
Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2003) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 983
Ellison, A. M. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00603.x · Cited by 786
Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes
Meyer, J. L., Paul, M. J., & Taulbee, W. K. (2005) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/04-021.1 · Cited by 747
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., Walsh, C. J., & Taylor, S. L. (2004) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0221-8 · Cited by 569
Self-citation
Cited by
The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure
Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., & Morgan, R. P. (2005) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/04-028.1 · Cited by 3,018
Self-citationFletcher, T. D., Andrieu, H., & Hamel, P. (2013) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001 · Cited by 1,015
Self-citationPataki, D. E., Carreiro, M. M., Cherrier, J., Grulke, N. E., Jennings, V., Pincetl, S., Pouyat, R. V., Whitlow, T. H., & Zipperer, W. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/090220 · Cited by 860
Linkages between flow regime, biota, and ecosystem processes: implications for river restoration
Palmer, M., & Ruhi, A. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw2087 · Cited by 791
Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes
Meyer, J. L., Paul, M. J., & Taulbee, W. K. (2005) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/04-021.1 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., & Ladson, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the North American Benthological Society
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 690-705
- ISSN
- 0887-3593 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-237X
- OpenAlex
- W1964580939
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 28.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1899/04-020.1
- The paper
- Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., & Ladson, A. R. (2005). Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. https://doi.org/10.1899/04-020.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.