The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SENSORY EXTINCTION AND SENSORY REINFORCEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR PROGRAMMING MULTIPLE ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR CHANGE
Open accessAbstract
The role of sensory reinforcement was examined in programming multiple treatment gains in self‐stimulation and spontaneous play for developmentally disabled children. Two phases were planned. First, we attempted to identify reinforcers maintaining self‐stimulation. Sensory Extinction procedures were implemented in which auditory, proprioceptive, or visual sensory consequences of self‐stimulatory behavior were systematically removed and reintroduced in a reversal design. When self‐stimulation was decreased or eliminated as a result of removing one of these sensory consequences, the functional sensory consequence was designated as a child's preferred sensory reinforcer. In Phase 2, we assessed whether children would play selectively with toys producing the preferred kind of sensory stimulation. The results showed the following. (1) Self‐stimulatory behavior was found to be maintained by sensory reinforcement. When the sensory reinforcer was removed, self‐stimulation extinguished. (2) The sensory reinforcers identified for self‐stimulatory behavior also served as reinforcers for new, appropriate toy play. (3) The multiple treatment gains observed appeared to be relatively durable in the absence of external reinforcers for play or restraints on self‐stimulation. These results illustrate one instance in which multiple behavior change may be programmed in a predictable, lawful fashion by using “natural communities of sensory reinforcement.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SOME GENERALIZATION AND FOLLOW‐UP MEASURES ON AUTISTIC CHILDREN IN BEHAVIOR THERAPY 1
Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. S. (1973) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1973.6-131 · Cited by 798
Cited by
Toward a functional analysis of self-injury
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197 · Cited by 2,644
WHAT MAKES EXTINCTION WORK: AN ANALYSIS OF PROCEDURAL FORM AND FUNCTION
Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Cowdery, G. E., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-131 · Cited by 338
SOCIAL INFLUENCES ON “SELF‐STIMULATORY” BEHAVIOR: ANALYSIS AND TREATMENT APPLICATION
Durand, V. M., & Carr, E. G. (1987) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1987.20-119 · Cited by 271
Torrado, J. C., Gomez, J., & Montoro, G. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17061359 · Cited by 130
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation for Stereotypic and Repetitive Behavior
Joosten, A. V., Bundy, A. C., & Einfeld, S. L. (2009) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0654-7 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Rincover, A., Cook, R., Peoples, A., & Packard, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-233
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- OpenAlex
- W2044506126
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SENSORY EXTINCTION AND SENSORY REINFORCEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR PROGRAMMING MULTIPLE ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR CHANGE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-221
- The paper
- Rincover, A., Cook, R., Peoples, A., & Packard, D. (1979). SENSORY EXTINCTION AND SENSORY REINFORCEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR PROGRAMMING MULTIPLE ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR CHANGE. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.