Cited by 338Behavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

WHAT MAKES EXTINCTION WORK: AN ANALYSIS OF PROCEDURAL FORM AND FUNCTION

Open access
Iwata, Brian A., Pace, Gary M., Cowdery, Glynnis Edwards, Miltenberger, Raymond G.·1994·Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

We examined methods for determining how extinction should be applied to different functions of self‐injurious behavior (SIB). Assessment data indicated that the head banging of 3 children with developmental disabilities was maintained by different reinforcement contingencies: One subject's SIB was positively reinforced by attention from adults, the 2nd subject's SIB was negatively reinforced by escape from educational tasks, and the 3rd subject's SIB appeared to be automatically reinforced or “self‐stimulatory” in nature. Three functional variations of extinction—EXT (attention), EXT (escape), and EXT (sensory)—were evaluated, and each subject was exposed to at least two of these variations in reversal or multiple baseline designs. Reductions in SIB were observed only when implementation of “extinction” involved the discontinuation of reinforcement previously shown to be responsible for maintaining the behavior. These results highlight important differences among treatment techniques based on the same behavioral principle (extinction) when applied to topographically similar but functionally dissimilar responses, and further illustrate the practical implications of a functional analysis of behavior disorders for designing, selecting, and classifying therapeutic interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-131

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [12]12. C. Repp & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 301-331). Syca- more, IL: Sycamore Publishing Co.
  2. [20]20. O'Brien, S., Karsh, K. G. (1990). Treatment acceptability: Consumer, therapist, and society. In A. C. Repp & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with develop- mental disabilities (pp. 504-516). Sycamore, IL: Syc- amore Publishing Co.
  3. [21]21. Plummer, S., Baer, D. M., & LeBlanc,J. M. (1977). Func- tional considerations in the use of time out and an ef- fective alternative. Journal of Applied Behavior Anal- ysis, 10, 689-705.
  4. [28]28. Solnick, J. V., Rincover, A., & Peterson, C. R. (1977). Some determinants of the reinforcing and punishing ef- fects of time out. Journal ofApplied Behavior Analysis, 10, 415-424.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Cowdery, G. E., & Miltenberger, R. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • North Dakota State University (US)
Corresponding author
Iwata, Brian A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-03
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
131-144
ISSN
  • 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3703
OpenAlex
W2130474705
Cited by
338
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Florida Department of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
extinction, self-harm, head banging, developmental disabilities, automatic reinforcement, self-stimulation, functional analysis, treatment selection, children
MeSH terms
Attention, Behavior Therapy, Child, Education of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities, Extinction, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Reinforcement, Psychology, Social Environment, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review