The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INCONSISTENT VISUAL ANALYSES OF INTRASUBJECT DATA
Open accessAbstract
Visual inspection has been the method of analysis most widely employed to evaluate the functional control demonstrated by any given set of intrasubject replication data. To identify the influence of certain graphic characteristics on these evaluative behaviors, 36 “ABAB reversal” figures were constructed. They were sent to 250 reviewers of behavioral journals. Their evaluation of each figure was expressed as a rating on a 100‐point scale of “experimental control.” Mean interrater agreement was 0.61. In addition to this rating, a verbal description of evaluation criteria was requested. It was also found that graphic characteristics determine evaluative judgments in concert rather than singly. For example, phase mean changes had to be a pattern consistent with the hypothesized effect of the experimental variables, while degrees of mean shift and variability were less important. A description of the following evaluative criteria was presented: (a) topographic characteristics, (b) format of data presentation, (c) intraexperimental, and (d) extra‐experimental circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change
Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (1976) · Cited by 3,036
Tactics of Scientific Research
Sidman, M. (1960) · Cited by 1,638
“PERHAPS IT WOULD BE BETTER NOT TO KNOW EVERYTHING”1
Baer, D. M. (1977) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-167 · Cited by 278
EFFECTS OF SERIAL DEPENDENCY ON THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN VISUAL AND STATISTICAL INFERENCE1
Jones, R. R., Weinrott, M. R., & Vaught, R. S. (1978) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-277 · Cited by 186
Cited by
An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs.
Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006 · Cited by 1,126
Evaluating Intervention Effects in Single‐Case Research Designs
Vannest, K. J., & Ninci, J. (2015) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/jcad.12038 · Cited by 665
Fisher, W. W., Kelley, M. E., & Lomas, J. E. (2003) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-387 · Cited by 351
(2002) · Identification of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.4324/9781410606297-11 · Cited by 267
Matyas, T. A., & Greenwood, K. M. (1990) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-341 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 573-579
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- OpenAlex
- W2157303280
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INCONSISTENT VISUAL ANALYSES OF INTRASUBJECT DATA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-573
- The paper
- DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S. (1979). INCONSISTENT VISUAL ANALYSES OF INTRASUBJECT DATA. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
