The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RESPONSIVENESS TO INTERVENTION: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF LEARNING DISABILITIES
Abstract
The process by which public schools identify students as learning disabled often appears to be confusing, unfair, and logically inconsistent. In fact, G. Reid Lyon of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development has suggested that the field of learning disabilities is a sociological sponge whose purpose has been and is to clean up the spills of general education. Research indicates that substantial proportions of school-identified students with learning disability (LD) fail to meet state or federal eligibility criteria (Lyon, 1996; MacMillan, Gresham, & Bocian, 1998; Shaywitz, Shaywitz, Fletcher, & Escobar, 1990; Shepard, Smith, & Vojir, 1983). In discussing this situation, MacMillan and Speece (1999) noted that although this finding is not in and of itself surprising, the magnitude of the percentage of school-identified LD students who fail to meet eligibility criteria ranged from 52 to 70%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,737
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Tufte, E. R., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286442 · Cited by 5,180
Madison, P., & Mischel, W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421067 · Cited by 4,346
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
Wolf, M. M. (1978) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203 · Cited by 3,176
The two disciplines of scientific psychology.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0043943 · Cited by 2,523
Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.
Cronbach, L. J. (1975) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0076829 · Cited by 2,094
Hinshaw, S. P. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.111.1.127 · Cited by 1,632
Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.101.1.147 · Cited by 1,514
Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(84)80002-7 · Cited by 1,294
Cited by
Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.394 · Cited by 316
Assessing Intervention Responsiveness: Conceptual and Technical Issues
Fuchs, L. S. (2003) · Learning Disabilities Research & Practice · doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00073 · Cited by 236
Comparison of dual discrepancy criteria to assess response to intervention
Burns, M. K., & Senesac, B. V. (2005) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.09.003 · Cited by 111
Reliability of Decision-Making Frameworks for Response to Intervention for Reading
Burns, M. K., Scholin, S. E., Kosciolek, S., & Livingston, J. (2010) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282909342374 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Venue
- Identification of Learning Disabilities
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2002-12-18
- Pages
- 491-588
- OpenAlex
- W2996229241
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 119
- FWCI
- 20.88
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RESPONSIVENESS TO INTERVENTION: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF LEARNING DISABILITIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781410606297-11
- The paper
- RESPONSIVENESS TO INTERVENTION: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF LEARNING DISABILITIES. (2002). Identification of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606297-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
