Cited by 380Behavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE EFFICIENCY ON FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT COMPETING BEHAVIORS

Open access
Horner, Robert H., Day, H. Michael·1991·Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

Three experiments addressed the role of response efficiency in the application of functional equivalence training. Functional equivalence training includes conducting a functional assessment of the problem behavior. Variables that predict and maintain the problem behavior are defined, and socially appropriate, functionally equivalent skills are identified and taught. The logic is that if the learner has a socially appropriate way to achieve the same function, he or she will be less likely to use problem behaviors. This study examined the role of response efficiency in functional equivalence training. Response efficiency was examined in terms of three variables: (a) physical effort, (b) schedule of reinforcement, and (c) the time delay between presentation of the discriminative stimulus and reinforcer delivery. Each of the three experiments involved a person who performed a set of problem behaviors and a functional assessment of the problem behaviors. A socially appropriate alternative response was taught, but this new response was less efficient than the problem behavior on one of the efficiency variables (effort, schedule, delay in time). The new behaviors did not compete successfully with the problem behaviors until a new, more efficient, alternative behavior was taught. These results are discussed in terms of our understanding of response covariation and the need in applied contexts to include response efficiency in any functional analysis assessment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-719

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procrastination might be better explained as a behavioral problem that can differ in character or topography but shares the same underlying mechanisms-namely, the preference for an immediate reward or escape from a potentially aversive experience-highlighting responses that are of functional equivalence.

    “Consequently, procrastination might be better explained as a behavioral problem that can differ in character or topography but shares the same underlying mechanisms-namely, the preference for an immediate reward or escape from a potentially aversive experience-highlighting responses that are of functional equivalence (Horner & Day, 1991).”

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 380

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bellamy G. T., 1979, Vocational habilitation of severely retarded adults: A direct service technology
  3. Bijou S. W., 1978, Behavior analysis of child development
  4. Carr E. G., 1988, Generalization and maintenance: Life‐style changes in applied settings, 221
  5. 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111 · DOI
  6. Carr E. G., 1990, Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities, 361
  7. Carr E. G., 1990, Positive approaches to the treatment of severe behavior problems in persons with developmental disabilities: A review and analysis of reinforcement and stimulus‐based procedures
  8. 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-387 · DOI
  10. Durand V. M., 1984, Attention‐getting problem behavior: Analysis and intervention
  11. Durand V. M., 1990, Functional communication training: An intervention program for severe behavior problems
  12. 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-119 · DOI
  13. Durand V. M., 1989, Reinforcer assessment I: Using problem behavior to select reinforcers, Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 113, 10.1177/154079698901400203 · DOI
  14. 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-235 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0272-7358(90)90074-K · DOI
  16. 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107 · DOI
  19. Horner R. H., 1988, Generalization and maintenance: Life‐style changes in applied settings, 197
  20. 10.1177/154079699001500205 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0270-4684(82)90003-9 · DOI
  22. Johnston J. M., 1980, Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research
  23. LaVigna G. W., 1986, Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with nonaversive strategies
  24. 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-507 · DOI
  25. 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-123 · DOI
  26. 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-197 · DOI
  27. Meyer L. H., 1989, Nonaversive intervention for behavior problems: A manual for home and community
  28. Millinson J. R., 1979, Principles of behavioral analysis
  29. O'Neill R. E., 1991, Functional analysis: A practical assessment guide
  30. 10.1007/BF01046175 · DOI
  31. Paisey T. J. H., 1990, Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities, 175
  32. 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-241 · DOI
  33. 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-281 · DOI
  34. Repp A. C., 1990, Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities
  35. 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-209 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0022-0965(82)90060-1 · DOI
  37. 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-431 · DOI
  38. Sprague J. R., Covariation within functional response classes: Implications for treatment of severe problem behaviors, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
  39. 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-417 · DOI
  40. 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-331 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Horner, R. H., & Day, H. M.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Horner, Robert H.
Venue
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
719-732
ISSN
  • 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3703
OpenAlex
W2042089635
Cited by
380
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
response efficiency, behavioral problems, functional assessment, physical exertion, reinforcement schedules, time delay, functional analysis
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Behavior Therapy, Child, Education of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities, Physical Exertion, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Problem Solving, Reinforcement Schedule, Group Homes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review