The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more-than, and less-than
Open accessAbstract
In Experiment 1, 2 experimental subjects were given pretraining of nonarbitrary relations that brought their responses under the control of four contextual stimuli; same, opposite, more than, and less than. One control subject was not exposed to this pretraining. The 2 pretrained subjects and the 3rd nonpretrained subject then received training in six arbitrary relations, the following four relations being the most critical: same/A1‐B1, same/A1‐C1, less than/A1‐B2, more than/A1‐C2. All 3 subjects were then tested for seven derived relations, the following three relations being the most important: same/B1‐C1, more than/B1‐C2, less than/B1‐B2. The 2 pretrained subjects, but not the nonpretrained subject, showed the derived relations. One of the stimuli (B1) from the relational network and two novel stimuli (X1 and X2) were then used to train three different self‐discrimination responses on three complex schedules of reinforcement. That is, all 3 subjects were trained to pick X1 if they had not emitted a response, to pick B1 if they had emitted one response only, and to pick X2 if they had emitted two responses only. The 2 pretrained subjects, but not the nonpretrained subject, showed the predicted transformation of self‐discrimination response functions in accordance with the relations of sameness, more than, and less than (i.e., no response, pick B2; one response only, pick C1; and two responses only, pick C2). In Experiment 2, 2 new subjects were employed, and the arbitrary relational training and testing phases were modified to control for a procedural artifact that may have contributed to the results of the first experiment. Experiment 2 replicated the findings of Experiment 1. The pattern of results support the utility of a relational frames approach to understanding derived stimulus relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“cognition alters the effects of other behavioral processes”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes (2006) · cites this paper as Dymond & Barnes, 1995
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes
Wulfert, E., & Hayes, S. C. (1988) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1988.50-125 · Cited by 366
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Barnes D., 1994, Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory, The Psychological Record, 44, 91
- 10.1007/BF03395151 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03395903 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03395091 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03395887 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-501 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-61 · DOI
- Barnes D., 1994, Response‐reinforcer contiguity and human performance on simple time‐based reinforcement schedules, The Psychological Record, 44, 63
- 10.1007/BF03392844 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03395144 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0376-6357(88)90033-2 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-251 · DOI
- 10.1080/14640749208401013 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03395907 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-369 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03395902 · DOI
- Hayes S. C., 1991, Dialogues on verbal behavior: The first international institute on verbal relations, 19
- Hayes S. C., 1987, Stimulus equivalence and the symbolic control of behavior, Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta, 13, 361
- 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-119 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03392637 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-0447-1_7 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-505 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-519 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03395901 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03395092 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 208
Relational reasoning with derived comparative relations: a novel model of transitive inference.
Munnelly, A., Dymond, S., & Hinton, E. (2010) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.05.007 · Cited by 29
Self-citationWho Can Understand Relational Frame Theory? A Reply to Barnes-Holmes and Hayes
Tonneau, F. (2002) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2002.11434209 · Cited by 28
“I have previously explained, in one case chosen for illustrative purposes, how this sort of account could apply to the behavior observed in Dymond and Barnes’ (1995) study—namely, choosing C2 after two bar presses (Tonneau, 2001, p. 123).”
BackgroundInfluentialACT in Context: An Exploration of Experiential Acceptance
Block‐Lerner, J., Wulfert, E., & Moses, E. (2009) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.04.005 · Cited by 29
The Experimental Analysis of Human Sexual Arousal: Some Recent Developments
Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1998) · The Behavior Analyst · doi:10.1007/bf03392779 · Cited by 27
Self-citationGuinther, P. M., & Dougher, M. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.015 · Cited by 26
“’ As has been demonstrated in basic laboratory research [36,37], a function newly acquired by Y would then come to be less pronounced in the presence of X and more pronounced in the presence of Z, despite the X and Z stimuli having no history of direct conditioning.”
BackgroundThe (not so) strange death of stimulus equivalence
Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S., & Roche, B. (2001) · doi:10.1080/15021149.2001.11434166 · Cited by 26
“…as we will discuss below it leaves untouched the substantial evidence that bidirectionality characterizes many different types of stimulus relations (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995, 1996; Roche & Barnes, 1996, 1997; Roche, Barnes-Holmes, Smeets, Barnes-Holmes, & McGeedy, 2000; Steele & Hayes, 1991).”
BackgroundDerived Relational Responding As An Operant: The Effects Of Between-Session Feedback
Healy, O., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (1998) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395286 · Cited by 25
Self-citationRelational frame theory and the experimental analysis of human sexuality
Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1997) · Applied and Preventive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0962-1849(97)80001-7 · Cited by 25
Self-citationControl by Contextual Stimuli in Novel Second-Order Conditional Discriminations
Pérez-González, L., & Martínez, H. (2007) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395568 · Cited by 25
Convergence of multiple fields on a relational reasoning approach to cognition.
McLoughlin, S., Tyndall, I. T., & Pereira, A. (2020) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101491 · Cited by 35
INFLUENCING CHILDREN'S PREGAMBLING GAME PLAYING VIA CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION TRAINING
Johnson, T. E., & Dixon, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-73 · Cited by 22
“The current study replicated previous studies with similar procedures that showed a transformation of stimulus functions of the contextual cues used in training (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Zlomke & Dixon, 2006).”
ResultPredicting and Influencing the Single-Trial-Type-Dominance-Effect: the First Study
Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., McEnteggart, C., & Kavanagh, D. (2019) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-019-00347-4 · Cited by 23
Perez, W., Kovac, R., Nico, Y. C., Caro, D. M., Fidalgo, A. P., Linares, I., de Almeida, J. D., & de Rose, J. D. (2017) · Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.284 · Cited by 23
Galizio, M. (2003) · The Behavior Analyst · doi:10.1007/bf03392074 · Cited by 23
Assessing the Development of Relational Framing in Young Children
Kirsten, E. B., & Stewart, I. (2021) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-021-00457-y · Cited by 33
“…other patterns of relational framing, including difference (e.g., Steele & Hayes, 1991), opposition (Barnes-Holmes et al., 2004), comparison (Dymond & Barnes, 1995), hierarchy (Gil et al., 2014), analogy (Barnes et al., 1997), temporality (O’Hora et al., 2005), and deixis (McHugh et al.,…”
BackgroundMing, S., Moran, L., & Stewart, I. (2014) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2014.11434722 · Cited by 21
“…(e.g., Dougher, Augustson, Markham, Greenway & Wulfert, 1994) whereby the behavioral functions of a given stimulus (e.g., discriminative [e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995] or eliciting [e.g., Dougher, et al. 1994]) transfer, without additional training, to other stimuli that participate in a…”
BackgroundDefusion: A behavior-analytic strategy for addressing private events
Snyder, K., Lambert, J., & Twohig, M. P. (2011) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/bf03391779 · Cited by 20
On Having a Goal: Goals as Representations or Behavior
Ramnerö, J., & Törneke, N. (2014) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0093-0 · Cited by 19
“…of opposition (Barnes-Holmes et al. 2004a; Carpentier et al. 2003; Dymond et al. 2008; Roche and Barnes 1997)—as well as comparative relations—that is, relating events as more-than or less-than (Barnes-Holmes et al. 2004c; Berens and Hayes 2007; Dymond and Barnes 1995; Munnelly et al. 2010).”
BackgroundStewart, I., Barrett, K., McHugh, L., Barnes‐Holmes, Y., & O’Hora, D. P. (2013) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.39 · Cited by 15
Equivalence Relations: A Reply
Tonneau, F. (2001) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2001.11434185 · Cited by 19
Levin, M. E., Hayes, S. C., & Vilardaga, R. (2013) · APA handbook of behavior analysis, Vol. 2: Translating principles into practice. · doi:10.1037/13938-018 · Cited by 18
“Humans can derive a wide variety of types of relations among events (e.g., Berens & Hayes, 2007; Dougher, Hamilton, Fink, & Harrington, 2007; Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Dymond, Roche, Forsyth, Whelan, & Rhoden, 2007; Hayes, Kohlenberg, & Hayes, 1991) that allow for novel responses to occur without a…”
BackgroundRoche, B., O’Reilly, A., Gavin, A., Ruiz, M., & Arancibia, G. (2012) · Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology · doi:10.3402/snp.v2i0.17335 · Cited by 17
“The different forms of relational responding (difference, opposition, greater than, less than, etc.) can also be derived without explicit training (Dymond and Barnes, 1995, 1990; Lipkens, Hayes, & Hayes, 1993; Roche & Barnes, 1996).”
BackgroundResponse-Response Relationships in Organizational Behavior Management
Austin, J., & Wilson, K. (2002) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1300/j075v21n04_04 · Cited by 17
“…reinforcing functions (Hayes, Brownstein, Devaney, Kohlenberg, & Shelby, 1987; Hayes, Kohlenberg, & Hayes, 1991), discriminative functions (Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Hayes et al., 1987), elicited conditioned emotional responses (Dougher, Augustson, Markham, Greenway, & Wulfert, 1994; Roche &…”
A behavior-analytic account of cognitive bias in clinical populations
Wray, A. M., Freund, R., & Dougher, M. (2009) · The Behavior Analyst · doi:10.1007/bf03392174 · Cited by 17
“…functions can be transformed in line with a number of other relations such as opposition, difference, before–after, and less than/ greater than (Dymond & Barnes, 1995, 1996; Green, Stromer, & Mackay, 1993; O’Hora & Barnes-Holmes, 2001; O’Hora, Roche, Barnes-Holmes, & Smeets, 2002; Roche &…”
BackgroundBehavior analysis and social constructionism: Some points of contact and departure
Roche, B. T., & Barnes‐Holmes, D. (2003) · The Behavior Analyst · doi:10.1007/bf03392077 · Cited by 17
“…depression (e.g., Hayes & Wilson, 1993), prejudice (Hayes, Niccolls, Masuda, & Rye, in press; Watt, Keenan, Barnes, & Cairns, 1991), selfawareness (Dymond & Barnes, 1995), the development of self-concept (Barnes, Lawlor, Smeets, & Roche, 1996), sexual arousal (Barnes & Roche, 1997b; Roche &…”
Acceptance and commitment therapy.
Hayes, S. C., & Lillis, J. (2014) · Psychotherapy theories and techniques: A reader. · doi:10.1037/14295-001 · Cited by 17
“…that such relations as knowing that one event is “larger” than another arbitrarily a) can be trained as an operant (BarnesHolmes, Barnes-Holmes, Smeets, Strand, & Friman, 2004, 2004; Berens & Hayes, in press), and b) will alter the impact of other behavioral processes (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995).”
BackgroundA Behavioral Phenomenological Inquiry of Maker Identity
Davis, D., & Mason, L. (2017) · doi:10.1037/bar0000060 · Cited by 15
“…discussions from Skinner (e.g., Skinner, 1974b), nonbehavioral psychologists (Mead, 1934), other behaviorists (e.g., Phelps, 2015), and more substantively as identified by relational frame (RFT) researchers (e.g., D. Barnes-Holmes, Hayes, & Dymond, 2001; Dymond & Barnes, 1995, 1997; Stewart, 2013).”
BackgroundTraining Relational Language to Improve Reading Comprehension
Newsome, K. B., Berens, K. N., Ghezzi, P., Aninao, T., & Newsome, W. (2014) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2014.11434512 · Cited by 15
“…applicable derived relational responding is operant behavior and that relational responding is the core process underlying language and cognition (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Healy, Barnes-Holmes, & Smeets, 2000; Lipkens, Hayes & Hayes, 1991; Steele & Hayes, 1991; Wulfert & Hayes, 1988).”
BackgroundColbert, D., Malone, A., Barrett, S., & Roche, B. T. (2019) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-019-00197-z · Cited by 22
The contextually controlled, feature-mediated classification of symbols.
DeRosse, P., & Fields, L. B. (2010) · Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-225 · Cited by 14
Dymond, S., Ng, T.-C., & Whelan, R. (2013) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.1.009 · Cited by 13
Self-citationRoche, B., & Dymond, S. (2008) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395604 · Cited by 13
“…and Difference (Dymond & Barnes, 1996; Steele & Hayes, 1991; Roche & Barnes, 1996, 1997; Whelan & Barnes-Holmes, 2004), More than and Less than (Dymond & Barnes, 1995; O’Hora, Roche, Barnes-Holmes, & Smeets, 2002; Whelan, Barnes-Holmes, & Dymond, 2006), and Before and After (Barnes-Holmes,…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationCullinan, V., & Vitale, A. (2008) · doi:10.1037/h0100237 · Cited by 13
Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002) · doi:10.1037/h0100489 · Cited by 13
Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1998) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395263 · Cited by 13
Self-citationLeech, A., Bouyrden, J., Bruijsten, N., Barnes‐Holmes, D., & McEnteggart, C. (2018) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.08.012 · Cited by 13
Perez, W. F., Nico, Y. C., Kovac, R., Fidalgo, A. P., & Leonardi, J. L. (2017) · Perspectivas em Análise do Comportamento · doi:10.18761/perspectivas.v4i1.105 · Cited by 21
“…funções de estímulo (e.g., reforçadora, eliciadora, discriminativa) estabelecidas para um dos estímulos da classe podem passar a ser apresentadas também pelos demais estímulos pertencentes à mesma classe (Augustson & Dougher, 1997; de Rose et al., 1988; Dougher et al., 1994; Dymond & Barnes, 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialMunnelly, A., Freegard, G., & Dymond, S. (2013) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.4.004 · Cited by 12
Self-citationAdcock, A. C., Merwin, R. M., Wilson, K., Drake, C., Tucker, C., & Elliott, C. (2010) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395693 · Cited by 12
“…of various modalities in the absence of such immediate contingencies (Carr, Wilkinson, Blackman, & McIlvane, 2000; DeGrandpre, Bickel, & Higgins, 1992; Dymond & Barnes, 1995, 1996; Green, Stromer, & MacKay, 1993; Roche & Barnes, 1996; Sidman, 1971; Sidman & Tailby, 1982; Steele & Hayes, 1991).”
Using Relational Frame Theory to build grammar in children with Autistic Spectrum Conditions
McHugh, L., & Reed, P. (2008) · The Journal of Speech and Language Pathology – Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1037/h0100233 · Cited by 12
Verbal understanding and Pavlovian processes.
Tonneau, F. (2004) · The Behavior Analyst Today · doi:10.1037/h0100029 · Cited by 11
“One final objection to stimulus-substitution accounts of verbal understanding comes from relational frame researchers, who argue that symbolic behavior exemplifies not only functional equivalence but also phenomena of function transformation (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995).”
Stimulus Control and Generalization
Pilgrim, C. A. (2015) · Autism and child psychopathology series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2656-5_2 · Cited by 12
Consciousness and Private Events
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., & Gifford, E. V. (1999) · Studies in cognitive systems · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9247-5_6 · Cited by 11
Carpenter, K. M., Amrhein, P. C., Bold, K. W., Mishlen, K., LEVIN, F. R., Raby, W. N., Evans, S. M., Foltin, R. W., & Nunes, E. V. (2016) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000063 · Cited by 8
“Although individuals can derive numerous types of relations (Dymond & Barnes, 1995), it has been argued that a significant proportion of everyday learning involves the formation and modification of equivalence classes (Leslie, Tierney, Robinson, Keenan, & Watt, 1993).”
BackgroundBrassil, N., Hyland, J., O'Hora, D., & Stewart, I. (2018) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-018-0323-y
(I Think) You Are Pretty: a Behavior Analytic Conceptualization of Flirtation
Wade, J. (2018) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-018-0136-y · Cited by 8
“Dymond and Barnes (1995) found support for transformation of stimulus function with more than/less than relations by changing consequences for the participant.”
BackgroundGómez, S., Barnes‐Holmes, Y., & Luciano, C. (2002) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395424 · Cited by 7
The fear factor: A functional perspective on anxiety
Friman, P. C., & Dymond, S. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805469-7.00016-4 · Cited by 9
Self-citationO’Reilly, A., Roche, B. T., & Cartwright, A. (2014) · Advances in psychology, mental health, and behavioral studies (APMHBS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6599-6.ch008 · Cited by 6
Maloney, E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0180-5 · Cited by 7
Testing and Training Analogical Relational Responding in Children With and Without Autism
Kirsten, E. B., Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2022) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-021-00493-8 · Cited by 7
Munnelly, A., Stewart, I., & Dymond, S. (2019) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-019-00350-9 · Cited by 7
Self-citationMcLoughlin, S. J., Tyndall, I., & Pereira, A. (2018) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2018.1507087 · Cited by 7
“…only understood relative to “right” (spatial responding; May, Stewart, Baez, Freegard, & Dymond, 2017), “more” relative to “less” (comparative responding; Dymond & Barnes, 1995), “before” relative to “after” (temporal responding; O’Hora, Pelaez, Barnes-Holmes, Rae, Robinson, & Chaudhary, 2008),…”
Hayes, S. C. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1300/j075v24n01_10 · Cited by 9
“…Smeets, Barnes-Holmes, & McGeady, 2000); • the generation of self descriptions and self-knowledge (e.g., Barnes, Lawlor, Smeets, & Roche, 1996; Dymond & Barnes, 1995); • social categorization and stereotyping (e.g., Kohlenberg, Hayes, & Hayes, 1991; Watt, Keenan, Barnes, & Cairns, 1991);…”
Relational Frame Theory is a Behavior Analytic Account: Is Tonneau’s?
Barnes-Holmes, D., & Hayes, S. (2002) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2002.11434208 · Cited by 7
“However, Tonneau has offered his own interpretations of the RFT data provided by Dymond and Barnes (1995) and Barnes, Hegarty, and Smeets (1997), and these afford us a limited opportunity to compare the two approaches.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMultiple Functions in Equivalence Classes
Mcveigh, B., & Keenan, M. (2009) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395651 · Cited by 7
Chapter 3 Metaphor, meaning and relational frame theory
Hayes, S., & Grundt, A. M. (1997) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(97)80135-5 · Cited by 7
Neilson, E. C., & Maitland, D. W. M. (2025) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100892 · Cited by 8
The transfer of social exclusion and inclusion functions through derived stimulus relations
Munnelly, A., Martin, G. R., Dack, C., Zedginidze, A., & McHugh, L. (2014) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-014-0144-z · Cited by 6
A Derived Transformation of Evaluative Preferences Using Implicit Association Tests
Amd, M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0033-z · Cited by 6
“…happy, unhappy, and neutral face stimuli were employed, and thus the frame of comparison is required to accommodate relational responding among these three stimuli (see Dymond and Barnes 1995, for a detailed conceptual and empirical treatment of this issue). representation of the trial types).”
A Recent Behaviour Analytic Approach to the Self
Stewart, I. (2013) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2013.11434460 · Cited by 7
“Subsequent studies showed transformation of self-discrimination functions via comparison (more / less) and opposition relations (Dymond and Barnes, 1995, 1996).”
BackgroundDifferential Reinforcement of Human Self-Reports about Schedule Performances
Okouchi, H., & Songmi, K. (2004) · doi:10.1007/bf03395485 · Cited by 6
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for OCD
Smith, B. M., Bluett, E. J., Lee, E. B., & Twohig, M. P. (2017) · The Wiley Handbook of Obsessive Compulsive Disorders · doi:10.1002/9781118890233.ch33 · Cited by 5
The selective action of Cfunc control.
Finn, M., & de Houwer, J. (2021) · Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.717 · Cited by 5
“Critically, studies of relational responding often employed stimuli for which only one function is explicitly experimentally engineered – the function that would be transformed via a stimulus relation (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Hayes et al., 1991; Roche & Barnes, 1997).”
Technical Notation as a Tool for Basic Research in Relational Frame Theory
McLoughlin, S. J., Tyndall, I., Mulhern, T., & Ashcroft, S. (2019) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-019-00344-7 · Cited by 5
Membership of Defined Responses in Stimulus Classes
Lionello-DeNolf, K. M., & Braga-Kenyon, P. (2013) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.4.005 · Cited by 5
Human Sexual Arousal: A Modern Behavioral Approach
Roche, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002) · The Behavior Analyst Today · doi:10.1037/h0099973 · Cited by 5
“…with multiple stimulus relations in the presence of appropriate contextual cues, such as difference, opposition, more than, and less than (Dymond & Barnes, 1995, 1996; Lipkens, Hayes, & Hayes, 1993; O’Hora, Roche, Barnes-Holmes, & Smeets, in press; Roche & Barnes, 1996, 1997; Roche, et…”
A Contextual Behavioral Approach to Pathological Altruism
Vilardaga, R., & Hayes, S. C. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199738571.003.0033 · Cited by 4
Direct and derived extinction of avoidance responses in equivalence classes
Boldrin, L. S., & Debert, P. (2020) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-020-00419-w · Cited by 5
“…F, São Paulo, SP 05508-030, Brazil that when a network of relations is established, functions that are acquired by a stimulus transform (or modify) the functions of other stimuli according to the type of relation that is established among them (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Dymond & Barnes, 1996).”
BackgroundUpdating RFT (More Field than Frame) and its Implications for Process-based Therapy
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McEnteggart, C. (2020) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-019-00372-3 · Cited by 4
Roche, B., Cummins, J., Cassidy, S., Dillon, A., Moore, L., & Grey, I. (2023) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.03.012 · Cited by 4
Testing and Training Analogical Responding in Young Children Using A Relational Evaluation Procedure
Kirsten, E. B., Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2021) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-021-00468-9 · Cited by 4
“…other patterns of framing including, for example, difference (e.g., Steele & Hayes, 1991), opposition (Barnes-Holmes et al., 2004a), comparison (Dymond & Barnes, 1995), hierarchy (Gil et al., 2014), analogy (Barnes et al., 1997), temporality (O’Hora et al., 2005), and deixis (McHugh et al.,…”
BackgroundStewart, I., Dymond, S., & Roche, B. (2019) · Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.555 · Cited by 4
“…DRR in accordance with multiple relations and attendant forms of stimulus function transformation (e.g., Dougher, Hamilton, Fink, & Harrington, 2007; Dymond & Barnes, 1995, 1996; Hoon, Bickford, Samuels, & Dymond, 2019; Hughes et al., 2018; May, Stewart, Baez, Freegard & Dymond, 2017; McLoughlin…”
Self-citationDymond, S., Molet, M., & Davies, L. (2017) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1200639 · Cited by 4
“…stimuli that differ along a specified physical dimension, such as size, but which may then be applied to any arbitrary stimuli, given appropriate contextual cues (Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Munnelly, Dymond, & Hinton, 2010; Reilly, Whelan, & Barnes-Holmes, 2005; Whelan, Barnes-Holmes, & Dymond, 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHayes, J., Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2016) · doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0199-7 · Cited by 4
Transformación de funciones: Marcos de coordinación y oposición de acuerdo con equivalencia
Castañeda, D. R., & Becerra, I. G. (2010) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · doi:10.14349/rlp.v42i2.484 · Cited by 4
The Fear Factor: A Functional Perspective on Anxiety
Friman, P. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012372544-8/50018-5 · Cited by 4
The role of intraverbal bidirectional naming in the establishment of comparative relations.
Luoma, S. M., Miguel, C. F., LaFrance, D. L., & Lee, V. N. (2024) · Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.4207 · Cited by 3
Stricker, C., Mao, J., Cassidy, S., Colbert, D., & Roche, B. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-024-09559-3 · Cited by 3
“…& Barnes, 1997), opposition (Barnes-Holmes, et al., 2004a, 2004b; Steele & Hayes, 1991), comparison (in terms of any stimulus dimension or property; Dymond & Barnes, 1995), temporality (O’Hora et al., 2008), analogy (i.e., relations between relations; Stewart et al., 2004), hierarchy (Slattery &…”
Murthy, V. E., Stapleton, A., & McHugh, L. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.06.003 · Cited by 8
Hayes, J., Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2016) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0191-2 · Cited by 3
“…Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701, USA hierarchical (e.g., ‘Potatoes are a type of vegetable’), etc. (Barnes-Holmes, Barnes-Holmes, Smeets, Strand & Friman, 2004; Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Dymond, Ng, & Whelan, 2013; Luciano, Gomez, & Rodriguez, 2007; May, Stewart, Baez, Freegard, & Dymond, under…”
Visdómine-Lozano, J. C. (2015) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.06.005 · Cited by 5
Induction of a Generalized Transitivity Repertoire Via Multiple-Exemplar Training and Staged Testing
Varelas, A., & Fields, L. B. (2015) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-015-0129-0 · Cited by 3
“…together will also occasion these performances (Barnes & Dymond, 1996; Barnes-Holmes, Barnes-Holmes, Roche, & Smeets, 2001a, b; Boelens & van den Broek, 2000; Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Fields & Reeve, 2000; Hayes & Hayes, 1989; Premack, 1971, 1976; Smoke, 1932; Wright, Cook, & Kendrick, 1989).”
Transfer of Function through Equivalence Relations using Pictures with Strong Emotional Content
Ferro, R., & Valero, L. (2008) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2008.11434292 · Cited by 3
“…sexual arousal (Roche & Barnes, 1996, 1997; Roche, BarnesHolmes, Smeets, Barnes-Holmes, & McGeady, 2000); self-discrimination response functions (Dymond & Barnes, 1994; 1995; 1996); mood functions (Barnes-Holmes, Barnes-Holmes, Smeets, & Luciano, 2004), and judgement rating functions with…”
Hume's psychology, contemporary learning theory, and the problem of knowledge amplification
Wilson, K. G., O’Donohue, W., & Hayes, S. C. (2001) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0732-118x(00)00014-3 · Cited by 7
Finn, M., Raemaekers, M., & de Houwer, J. (2023) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.11.005 · Cited by 2
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for OC‐Spectrum Disorders
Morrison, K. L., Smith, B. M., Lee, E. B., & Twohig, M. P. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118890233.ch65
Stewart, I. (2017) · The Behavior Analyst · doi:10.1007/s40614-017-0099-4 · Cited by 3
“…A; Steele & Hayes, 1991; Stewart et al., 2015), comparison (e.g., if trained that A is more than B, participants derive that B is less than A; Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Berens & Hayes, 2007), distinction (e.g., Roche & Barnes, 1996), hierarchy (e.g., Gil, Luciano, Ruiz, & Salas, 2012; Slattery…”
BackgroundDiscrimination of Fixed-Interval Schedules by Humans
Okouchi, H. (2013) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.3.013 · Cited by 2
Carpenter, K. M., Foltin, R. W., Haney, M., & Evans, S. M. (2023) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-023-00554-0 · Cited by 2
“…the transformation of a wide range of stimulus functions in accordance with derived relations (Auguston & Dougher, 1997; Barnes-Holmes et al., 2000; Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Greenway et al., 1996; Hayes et al., 1991; Roche et al., 2000), including eliciting functions (Dougher et al., 2007).”
BackgroundCONTEXTUAL CONTROL OF CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION OF THE OWN BEHAVIOR IN PIGEONS
García, A., Gómez, J., & Benjumea, S. (2008) · doi:10.21500/20112084.960 · Cited by 1
Transfer of Function of Visual Stimuli through Equivalence Relations with Verbal Stimuli
Ferro, R., & Valero, L. (2006) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2006.11434260 · Cited by 1
“…& Dougher, 1997; Augustson, Dougher, & Markham, 2000; Dougher, Augustson, et al., 1994; Markham, Dougher, & Augustson, 2002), conditioned sexual arousal (Roche & Barnes, 1996, 1997; Roche, Barnes-Holmes, et al, 2000) and self-discrimination response functions (Dymond & Barnes, 1994; 1995; 1996).”
A transformation of discriminative functions in accordance with equivalence relations
Dymond, S., Whelan, R., & Smeets, P. M. (2005) · European Journal of Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1080/15021149.2005.11434255 · Cited by 1
“Specifically, research has shown that any stimulus function can be transformed in accordance with the particular relation employed (e.g., Dymond & Barnes, 1995; Roche, Barnes-Holmes, Smeets, Barnes-Holmes, & McGeady, 2000; Whelan & Barnes-Holmes, 2004).”
MethodSelf-citationBehavior Analysis and the Treatment of Human Psychological Suffering
Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McEnteggart, C. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-420249-8.00018-6 · Cited by 1
“For RFT, however, this outcome is easily explained by the transformation of the reinforcing function through the comparative relation between A and B (Dymond & Barnes, 1995).”
BackgroundCuper, P. F., & Lynch, T. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012372544-8/50021-5 · Cited by 1
Mattaini, M. (1996) · The Behavior Analyst · doi:10.1007/bf03392755 · Cited by 1
Transformation of Meaning Through Relations of Sameness and Opposition
Perez, W., de Almeida, J. D., & de Rose, J. D. (2015) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-015-0138-z
A Preliminary Examination of Derived Relational Responding in the Context of Body Image
Sandoz, E. K., Bordieri, M. J., Tyndall, I. T., & Auzenne, J. (2020) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-020-00439-6 · Cited by 2
A Partially Hardcoded Computational Model of Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding
Raemaekers, M., Finn, M., & de Houwer, J. (2026) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2026.101002
Derived asymmetric and transitive relations using the go/no‐go procedure with compound stimuli
Modenesi, R. D., & Debert, P. (2026) · Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.70088
“Studies have frequently used the MTS procedure to establish these derived relations formats (e.g., Belisle et al., 2020; Dymond & Barnes, 1995; O ’ Hora et al., 2002; Perez et al., 2015; Roche & Dymond, 2008; Steele & Hayes, 1991; Whelan et al., 2006).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Dymond, S., & Barnes, D.
- Affiliations
- University College Cork (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Dymond, Simon
- ORCID
- Dymond, Simon
- Venue
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-184
- ISSN
- 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3711
- PMC
- PMC1350108
- OpenAlex
- W2053439414
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- self-discrimination, derived stimulus relations, relational frames, arbitrary relations, sameness, more than, derived relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
