The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AN EVALUATION OF PERSISTENCE OF TREATMENT EFFECTS DURING LONG‐TERM TREATMENT OF DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR
Open accessAbstract
Eight young children who displayed destructive behavior maintained, at least in part, by negative reinforcement received long‐term functional communication training (FCT). During FCT, the children completed a portion of a task and then touched a communication card attached to a microswitch to obtain brief breaks. Prior to and intermittently throughout FCT, extinction probes were conducted within a withdrawal design in which task completion, manding, and destructive behavior were placed on extinction to evaluate the relative persistence of appropriate and destructive behavior over the course of treatment. FCT continued until appropriate behavior persisted and destructive behavior failed to recur at baseline levels during extinction probes. The completion of FCT was followed by four challenges to the persistence of treatment effects conducted within mixed‐ or multiple‐schedule designs: (a) extended extinction sessions (from 5 to 15 min), (b) introduction of a novel task, (c) removal of the microswitch and communication card, and (d) a mixed schedule of reinforcement in which both appropriate and destructive behavior produced reinforcement. The results showed that although FCT often resulted in quick reductions in destructive behavior and increases in appropriate behavior, destructive behavior often recurred during the extinction probes conducted during the initial treatment. When the effects of treatment persisted during the extinction probes, the remaining challenges to treatment effects resulted in only mild to moderate disruptions in behavior. These results are consistent with the quantitative predictions of behavioral momentum theory and may provide an alternative definition of maintenance as constituting behavioral persistence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AN IMPLICIT TECHNOLOGY OF GENERALIZATION 1
Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349 · Cited by 3,351
Toward a functional analysis of self-injury
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197 · Cited by 2,644
Cited by
Wacker, D. P., Lee, J. F., Padilla Dalmau, Y. C., Kopelman, T. G., Lindgren, S. D., Kuhle, J., Pelzel, K. E., Dyson, S., Schieltz, K. M., & Waldron, D. B. (2013) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-012-9314-0 · Cited by 270
Self-citationBehavioral Treatment of Problem Behavior for an Adult with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Misophonia
Haq, S. S., Alresheed, F., & Tu, J. C. (2021) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-020-09780-8 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Wacker, D. P., Harding, J. W., Berg, W. K., Lee, J. F., Schieltz, K. M., Padilla, Y. C., Nevin, J. A., & Shahan, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-282
- ISSN
- 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3711
- OpenAlex
- W2116000083
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AN EVALUATION OF PERSISTENCE OF TREATMENT EFFECTS DURING LONG‐TERM TREATMENT OF DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jeab.2011.96-261
- The paper
- Wacker, D. P., Harding, J. W., Berg, W. K., Lee, J. F., Schieltz, K. M., Padilla, Y. C., Nevin, J. A., & Shahan, T. A. (2011). AN EVALUATION OF PERSISTENCE OF TREATMENT EFFECTS DURING LONG‐TERM TREATMENT OF DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2011.96-261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.