Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biological Evaluation of Chitosan Nanofiber Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration

Shin, Seung‐Yun, Park, Ho‐Nam, Kim, Kyoung‐Hwa, Lee, Myung‐Hee, Choi, Young Suk, Park, Yoon‐Jeong, Lee, Yong‐Moo, Ku, Young, Rhyu, In‐Chul, Han, Soo‐Boo, Lee, Seung‐Jin, Chung, Chong‐Pyoung·2005·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: Chitosan is known as a biodegradable and non‐toxic natural polymer that enhances wound healing and bone formation. The aims of this study are to evaluate the biocompatibility of chitosan nanofiber membranes and to examine the effect of the chitosan nanofiber membranes on bone regeneration in rabbit calvarial defects. Methods: In vitro cell proliferation tests using human osteosarcoma cell line MG63 and reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) to evaluate the expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), collagen, osteocalcin (OCN), and GAPDH were done on chitosan nanofiber membranes. Chitosan nanofiber membranes were implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue and observed for 2, 4, and 6 weeks in rats. Ten‐millimeter diameter round cranial defects were made in rabbits and covered by chitosan nanofiber membranes for 4 weeks. Specimens were decalcified and observed by a light microscope. Results: MG63 cells proliferated for 28 days on the chitosan nanofiber membranes and expressed ALP, collagen, OCN, and GAPDH at 2 weeks. Chitosan nanofiber membranes that were grafted into rat subcutaneous tissue maintained their shape and space for bone regeneration for as long as 6 weeks. No inflammation could be seen on the membrane surface or in the surrounding tissues. In the rabbit calvarial defects, new bone filled the defects and fused to the original old bone in 4 weeks. Conclusions: The biocompatibility of the chitosan nanofiber membrane was confirmed, with enhanced bone regeneration and no evidence of an inflammatory reaction. This experiment shows that the novel biodegradable chitosan nanofiber membrane may be useful as a tool for guided bone regeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1778

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Shin, S., Park, H., Kim, K., Lee, M., Choi, Y. S., Park, Y., Lee, Y., Ku, Y., Rhyu, I., Han, S., Lee, S., & Chung, C.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10
Volume
76
Issue
10
Pages
1778-1784
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2012777460
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Evaluation of Chitosan Nanofiber Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1778
The paper
Shin, S., Park, H., Kim, K., Lee, M., Choi, Y. S., Park, Y., Lee, Y., Ku, Y., Rhyu, I., Han, S., Lee, S., & Chung, C. (2005). Biological Evaluation of Chitosan Nanofiber Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1778

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.