Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diabetes and Periodontal Disease: A Case‐Control Study

Campus, Guglielmo, Salem, Abeer, Uzzau, Sergio, Baldoni, Edoardo, Tonolo, Giancarlo·2005·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: Periodontitis is often associated with diabetes and might be considered one of the chronic complications of diabetes mellitus, both in Type 1 (T1DM) and Type 2 (T2DM). This case‐control study was designed to evaluate the possible association between non–insulin‐dependent diabetes (T2DM) and clinical and microbiological periodontal disease among adult Sardinians. Methods: A total of 212 individuals participated in this study: 71 T2DM patients aged 61.0 ± 11.0 years and 141 non‐diabetic controls in good general health aged 59.1 ± 9.2 years. All subjects were given a clinical periodontal examination for probing depth, attachment level, presence of calculus, bleeding on probing, and assessment of plaque. Subgingival plaque samples were obtained, and P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, and T. forsythensis were identified using multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Results: T2DM patients showed a significantly lower number of teeth present (P = 0.002); a significant increase in number of probing depths >4 mm, and percent of pocket depths >4 mm (P = 0.04 and P = 0.05, respectively); periodontitis (P = 0.046); bleeding on probing (P = 0.02); and plaque index (P = 0.01). A significant association with diabetes was detected for plaque (X 2 = 4.46; P <0.05) and bleeding on probing (X 2 = 3.60; P <0.05). Concerning bacteria prevalence, a positive association was detected for P. gingivalis (X 2 = 2.80; P <0.05) and T. forsythensis (X 2 = 3.87; P <0.05). Presence of plaque was positively associated with case status (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2, 3.6) and with prevalence of P. gingivalis and T. forsythensis (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.3, 2.2; and 1.2, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.8, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with T2DM undoubtedly have a susceptibility for more severe periodontal disease. J Periodontol 2005;76: 418‐425.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.418

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Campus, G., Salem, A., Uzzau, S., Baldoni, E., & Tonolo, G.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
418-425
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2135744766
Cited by
280
References
1
FWCI
12.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diabetes and Periodontal Disease: A Case‐Control Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.418
The paper
Campus, G., Salem, A., Uzzau, S., Baldoni, E., & Tonolo, G. (2005). Diabetes and Periodontal Disease: A Case‐Control Study. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.418

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.