Cited by 41Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

The Efficacy of Subgingival Calculus Removal With Endoscopy‐Aided Scaling and Root Planing: A Study on Multirooted Teeth

Michaud, Robert M., Schoolfield, John, Mellonig, James T., Mealey, Brian L.·2007·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: The dental endoscope was developed to facilitate visualization of the subgingival environment as an aid in diagnosis and non‐surgical root debridement. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endoscopy‐aided scaling and root planing (SRP) resulted in a greater reduction of residual calculus compared to SRP alone in multirooted teeth. Methods: Twenty‐four patients were enrolled and contributed 35 tooth pairs (70 teeth in total). Each tooth per pair was randomly assigned to receive endoscopy‐aided SRP (test) or SRP alone (control). Both teeth were extracted immediately after treatment, washed with water, and stained with methylene blue. The percentage of residual calculus was determined via stereomicroscopy and digital image software by a single masked examiner. Results: Overall, there was 1.16% (P = 0.097) less residual calculus at test versus control sites. At interproximal surfaces, test roots had 2.63% less residual calculus than control roots (P = 0.003), whereas test roots had slightly more residual calculus than controls at buccal/lingual surfaces (0.36%; P = 0.652). There were no statistically significant differences in residual calculus between groups at deeper probing depths or at sites with deep furcation invasions. Only at shallower interproximal sites with probing depths ≤6 mm was significantly less residual calculus seen in roots treated with endoscopy (P = 0.020). Treatment time decreased significantly as operator experience increased; however, no significant improvement in residual calculus levels was noted with greater experience. Conclusion: Within the confines of this study, the use of the endoscope as an adjunct to traditional SRP provided no significant improvement in calculus removal in multirooted molar teeth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.2007.070251

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Removal of calculus and plaque in furcation sites of multirooted teeth may be limited, even when subgingival debridement is aided by endoscopy.

    “removal of calculus and plaque in furcation sites of multirooted teeth may be limited,281 even when subgingival debridement is aided by endoscopy.284”

    From The dental plaque biofilm matrix (2021) · cites this paper as [284]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michaud, R. M., Schoolfield, J., Mellonig, J. T., & Mealey, B. L.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Mealey, Brian L.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12
Volume
78
Issue
12
Pages
2238-2245
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2008732534
Cited by
41
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
multi-rooted teeth, molars, probing depth, furcation involvement, operator experience, treatment duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Dental Calculus, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Molar, Dental Scaling, Time Factors, Tooth Root

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review