Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical and Biochemical Evaluation of Lozenges Containing Lactobacillus reuteri as an Adjunct to Non‐Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Chronic Periodontitis

Open access
İnce, Gizem, Gürsoy, Hare, İpçi, Şebnem Dirikan, Cakar, Gokser, Emekli‐Alturfan, Ebru, Yılmaz, Selçuk·2015·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the effects on clinical and biochemical parameters of Lactobacillus reuteri–containing probiotic supplementation adjunctive to initial periodontal therapy in patients with chronic periodontitis (CP). Methods: Thirty patients with CP were included and divided into two groups. Every patient had, in each quadrant, ≥2 teeth each with approximal sites with a probing depth (PD) of 5 to 7 mm and gingival index (GI) of ≥2. The test group received scaling and root planing (SRP) and probiotic‐containing lozenges. The control group received SRP and placebo lozenges. Plaque index (PI), GI, bleeding on probing (BOP), PD, and attachment gain were measured. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was sampled for the analysis of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‐8 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)‐1 by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. All evaluations were performed at baseline and on days 21, 90, 180, and 360. Results: Differences in intergroup comparisons of PI, GI, BOP, and PD were found to be significant (P <0.05) in favor of the test group at all time points. Decreased GCF MMP‐8 levels and increased TIMP‐1 levels were found to be significant up to day 180 (P <0.05). Mean values of attachment gain were significantly higher in the test group compared with the control group on days 90, 180, and 360. Conclusions: Lozenges containing L. reuteri may be a useful supplement in moderately deep pockets of patients with CP. Low MMP‐8 and high TIMP‐1 levels may indicate the role of the lozenges in reduction of inflammation‐associated markers up to day 180.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.2015.140612

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
İnce, G., Gürsoy, H., İpçi, Ş. D., Cakar, G., Emekli‐Alturfan, E., & Yılmaz, S.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06
Volume
86
Issue
6
Pages
746-754
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2147935386
Cited by
196
References
4
FWCI
15.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and Biochemical Evaluation of Lozenges Containing Lactobacillus reuteri as an Adjunct to Non‐Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Chronic Periodontitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2015.140612
The paper
İnce, G., Gürsoy, H., İpçi, Ş. D., Cakar, G., Emekli‐Alturfan, E., & Yılmaz, S. (2015). Clinical and Biochemical Evaluation of Lozenges Containing Lactobacillus reuteri as an Adjunct to Non‐Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Chronic Periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140612

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.