The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Google Car: Driving Toward A Better Future?
Open accessAbstract
Googles dramatic ascent and subsequent domination in the past fifteen years of the technology and information industries has financially enabled Google to explore seemingly unrelated projects ranging from Google Mail to the Google Car. In particular, Google has invested a significant amount of resources in the Google Car, an integrated system that allows for the driverless operation of a vehicle. While initial reports indicate that the Google Car driverless automobile will be more safe and efficient than current vehicles, the Google Car is not without its critics. In particular, the existential threat that the car presents to several large industries, including the insurance, health care and construction industries, creates an additional challenge to the success of the Google Car well beyond the standard competitive threats from other established car manufacturers in the automobile industry, which begs the question, Can the Google Car be successful? With so many challenges above and beyond the competitive forces typically threatening long-term profitability, will the Google Car be able to create and sustain a competitive advantage for Google in the driverless car space?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“LiDAR sensors are currently being used by various companies, such as Google [60], BMW, and Volvo [61], to develop autonomous vehicles.”
From Sensor-Based Prognostic Health Management of Advanced Driver Assistance System for Autonomous Vehicles: A Recent Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Freund, R. J., Wilson, W. J., & Mohr, D. L. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374970-3.00001-9 · Cited by 580
Winning the Race With Ever-Smarter Machines
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. P. (2012) · Cited by 80
Crashes vs. Congestion – What’s the Cost to Society?
Meyer, M. D. (2008) · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Guizzo, E. (2011). How Google's self-driving car works. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/how-google-self-driving-car-works
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applications of artificial intelligence in transport: An overview
Abduljabbar, R., Dia, H., Liyanage, S., & Bagloee, S. A. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11010189 · Cited by 769
Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways
Papadoulis, A., Quddus, M., & Imprialou, M. (2019) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.019 · Cited by 480
End-to-End Lane Marker Detection via Row-wise Classification
Yoo, S., Lee, H., Myeong, H., Yun, S., Park, H. W., Cho, J., & Kim, D. H. (2020) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00511 · Cited by 225
MEMS-Based Lidar for Autonomous Driving
Yoo, H. W., Druml, N., Brunner, D., Schwarzl, C., Thurner, T., Hennecke, M., & Schitter, G. (2018) · e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik · doi:10.1007/s00502-018-0635-2 · Cited by 190
Mohammed, A. S., Amamou, A., Ayevide, F. K., Kélouwani, S., Agbossou, K., & Zioui, N. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20226532 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Poczter, S. L., & Jankovic, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- ORCID
- Poczter, Sharon L.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS)
- Publisher
- Clute Institute
- Published
- 2013-12-31
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7
- ISSN
- 1555-3353 (ISSN-L)
- 2157-8826
- OpenAlex
- W2177814138
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, competitive advantage, existential risk, automotive industry, insurance industry, health sector, construction industry, Google, business strategy, disruptive innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
