The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teaching Critical Thinking Skills In Higher Education: A Review Of The Literature
Open accessAbstract
The authors reviewed 42 empirical studies of teaching of critical thinking skills in postsecondary education published between 1994 and 2009. The instructional intervention, test measure, and research design of the studies were analyzed. Study results suggest that: (1) the same instructional interventions can lead to different results, depending on the intervention’s implementation; (2) qualitative data can inform researchers about intervention effects that are not easily captured by quantitative instruments; and (3) most studies reviewed are subject to limitations in research design, sample size, or sample representativeness. The following recommendations are made: (1) statistical significance should not be the only criterion for instructors to consider when choosing new teaching methods; (2) multiple test measures, including quantitative and qualitative, should be used to assess changes in students’ critical thinking skills; (3) future research should properly address internal validity threats, e.g. by adopting at least a quasi-experimental design, in order to establish causal relationship between intervention and changes in students’ critical thinking skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
(1990) · Cited by 2,028
Dooley, D. (1984) · Cited by 1,632
Developing Critical Thinkers: Challenging Adults to Explore Alternative Ways of Thinking and Acting
Humphreys, W. L., & Brookfield, S. D. (1989) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1317962 · Cited by 1,352
Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (1988) · Cited by 1,212
Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research
Ennis, R. H. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1174885 · Cited by 1,055
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308326084 · Cited by 977
Facione, P. A. (2000) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v20i1.2254 · Cited by 885
(2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807947 · Cited by 862
Cited by
Liu, Y., & Pásztor, A. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069 · Cited by 400
Tiruneh, D. T., Verburgh, A., & Elen, J. (2014) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v4n1p1 · Cited by 255
El Soufi, N., & See, B. H. (2019) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.006 · Cited by 183
A Literature Review of Critical Thinking in Engineering Education
Ahern, A., Dominguez, C., McNally, C., O’Sullivan, J. J., & Pedrosa, D. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1586325 · Cited by 127
Mahdi, O. R., Nassar, I. A., & Almuslamani, H. A. (2020) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p297 · Cited by 104
“Hence, case studies provide a larger amount of data that covers various aspects Behar-Horenstein and Niu (2011).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L.
- Venue
- Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC)
- Publisher
- Clute Institute
- Published
- 2011-02-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1544-0389 (ISSN-L)
- 2157-894X
- OpenAlex
- W2143309829
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 56.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teaching Critical Thinking Skills In Higher Education: A Review Of The Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.19030/tlc.v8i2.3554
- The paper
- Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills In Higher Education: A Review Of The Literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC). https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v8i2.3554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.