Strengthening Vocational Learning through Teaching Factory Implementation in Visual Communication Design
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to describe the implementation of the Teaching Factory (TEFA) learning model in Vocational High Schools (SMK), especially in the Visual Communication Design Study Program, using descriptive qualitative methods and purposive sampling techniques. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. Teaching Factory (TEFA) learning model is designed to integrate teaching and learning activities with real production processes in order to provide practical work experience to students through a production-based approach. The results of the study indicated that TEFA learning at SMK Al-Falah consists of seven systematic steps, namely: implementing design briefs, receiving orders, analyzing orders, stating order readiness, working on orders, conducting quality control, and submitting orders. One prominent characteristic is the "implementing the design brief" stage as a form of adjustment to the needs of the printing industry. This finding showed that the TEFA model not only bridged theoretical and practical learning but also provided a contextual, applicable learning experience that aligns with industry demands. Emphasizing TEFA learning not only represented the real production process but also bridged the gap between school learning and the world of work. Furthermore, it provided real-world work experience and improved students' overall competency, both in terms of technical skills (hard skills) and socio-professional skills (soft skills).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teaching Factory evidence links AI-aided workflows to industry readiness, yet lacks controlled comparisons and artefact creativity scoring.
“Teaching Factory (TEFA) evidence in vocational design links Artificial Intelligence aided workflows to industry readiness, yet lacks controlled comparisons and artefact creativity scoring (Khair and Astuti 2025).”
From A Study on the Role of Midjourney, A Generative Artificial Intelligence Tool, in Enhancing Student Creativity in Illustration Design Classes (2026) · cites this paper as Khair and Astuti 2025
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
He, S. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70305
Tjaturrini, D., Tazkiyah, D., Lusiana, Y., Prasetyowati, H., Utami, R., & Syahputri, A. A. (2026) · Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review · doi:10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v6.n02.pe08151
- Authors
- Khair, I., & Astuti, S.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr Hamka (ID)
- ORCID
- Astuti, Sri
- Venue
- Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran
- Published
- 2025-09-27
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 688-703
- ISSN
- 2355-3669 (ISSN-L)
- 2503-2518
- OpenAlex
- W4414586716
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Vocational Education and Training
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Systems and Policy
- Keywords
- teaching factory, vocational high school, visual communication design, design brief, production-based learning, printing industry, practical work experience, student competencies, soft skills, hard skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review