The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
Open accessAbstract
Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of distance education, and few instructional design guidelines based on a solid theoretical framework for mobile learning exist. In this paper I compare mobile learning (m-learning) with electronic learning (e-learning) and ubiquitous learning (u-learning) and describe the technological attributes and pedagogical affordances of mobile learning presented in previous studies. I modify transactional distance (TD) theory and adopt it as a relevant theoretical framework for mobile learning in distance education. Furthermore, I attempt to position previous studies into four types of mobile learning: 1) high transactional distance socialized m-learning, 2) high transactional distance individualized m-learning, 3) low transactional distance socialized m-learning, and 4) low transactional distance individualized m-learning. As a result, this paper can be used by instructional designers of open and distance learning to learn about the concepts of mobile learning and how mobile technologies can be incorporated into their teaching and learning more effectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
The Computer for the 21st Century
Weiser, M. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94 · Cited by 10,017
Activity, consciousness, and personality
Леонтьев, А. Н., & Hall, M. J. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,374
Activity theory and individual and social transformation
Engeström, Y. (1999) · Perspectives on Activity Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812774.003 · Cited by 3,142
Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research
Kuurti, K. (1995) · Context and Consciousness · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2137.003.0006 · Cited by 1,718
Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments
Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299477 · Cited by 1,181
“Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654306298273 · Cited by 1,113
The Theory of Transactional Distance
Moore, M. G. (2015) · Handbook of Distance Education · doi:10.4324/9780203803738.ch5 · Cited by 1,070
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6 · Cited by 989
Traxler, J. (2007) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.346 · Cited by 923
Cited by
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015 · Cited by 1,057
Hamidi, H., & Chavoshi, A. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.016 · Cited by 374
Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023) · Cogent Engineering · doi:10.1080/23311916.2023.2283282 · Cited by 269
Sabah, N. M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.009 · Cited by 157
Muthmainnah, Ibna Seraj, P. M., & Oteir, I. (2022) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/6468995 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, Y.
- Venue
- The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
- Publisher
- Athabasca University Press
- Published
- 2011-02-28
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 78
- ISSN
- 1492-3831 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1564589805
- Cited by
- 772
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 137.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.791
- The paper
- Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.791
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.