Cited by 9Semantic Web and OntologiesBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesNatural Language Processing Techniques

A semi-automatic approach to construct Vietnamese ontology from online text

Open access
Nguyen, Bao-An, Yang, Don-Lin·2012·The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning

Abstract

An ontology is an effective formal representation of knowledge used commonly in artificial intelligence, semantic web, software engineering, and information retrieval. In open and distance learning, ontologies are used as knowledge bases for e-learning supplements, educational recommenders, and question answering systems that support students with much needed resources. In such systems, ontology construction is one of the most important phases. Since there are abundant documents on the Internet, useful learning materials can be acquired openly with the use of an ontology. However, due to the lack of system support for ontology construction, it is difficult to construct self-instructional materials for Vietnamese people. In general, the cost of manual acquisition of ontologies from domain documents and expert knowledge is too high. Therefore, we present a support system for Vietnamese ontology construction using pattern-based mechanisms to discover Vietnamese concepts and conceptual relations from Vietnamese text documents. In this system, we use the combination of statistics-based, data mining, and Vietnamese natural language processing methods to develop concept and conceptual relation extraction algorithms to discover knowledge from Vietnamese text documents. From the experiments, we show that our approach provides a feasible solution to build Vietnamese ontologies used for supporting systems in education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19173/irrodl.v13i5.1250

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on Nguyen and Yang's suggestion, the aims of developing an AI-integrated system in education could be grouped into four types: classification (5 studies), matching (3 studies), recommendation (5 studies), and deep learning (10 studies).

    “Based on the above and Nguyen and Yang's suggestion [28], the aims of developing an AI-integrated system in education could be grouped into four types: classification (5 studies), matching (3 studies), recommendation (5 studies), and deep learning (10 studies).”

    From A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020 (2021) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Conclusion and Future Research section (page unavailable) identifies text classification and recommendation systems as possible applications of the ontology, which supports two of the cited categories. It does not suggest the four-part grouping: matching and deep learning are not included. The study counts appear to be the citing authors’ own grouping, rather than figures attributed to Nguyen and Yang. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Nguyen, C. Q., & Phan, T. T. (2009). Key phase extraction: A hybrid assignment and ex- traction approach. 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services (pp. 276-283).
  2. Saman, S., Seyed, Y. B., Nor, A. M. Z., & Shahrul, A. M. N. (2012). Ontological approach in knowledge based recommender system to develop the quality of e-learning system. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(2), 115-123.
  3. Subhashin, R., & Akilandeswari, J. (2011). A survey on ontology construction methodolo- gies. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business System, 1(1).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, B.-A., & Yang, D.-L.
Affiliations
  • Tra Vinh University (VN)
  • Feng Chia University (TW)
Venue
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
Published
2012-11-15
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
148
ISSN
1492-3831 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1580488490
Cited by
9
References
17
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
ontology construction, Vietnamese language, concept extraction, relation extraction, semi-automatic knowledge acquisition, online texts, online learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review