Cited by 16Education during COVID-19 pandemicSocial impacts of COVID-19Work-Family Balance Challenges

Inequalities in children’s experiences of home learning during the COVID-19 lockdown in England

Open access
Andrew, Alison, Cattan, Sarah, Costa Dias, Monica, Farquharson, Christine, Kraftman, Lucy, Krutikova, Sonya, Phimister, Angus, Sevilla, Almudena·2020

Abstract

This paper combines novel data on the time use, home learning practices and economic circumstances of families with children during the COVID-19 lockdown with pre-lockdown data from the UK Time User Survey to characterise the time use of children and how it changed during lockdown.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1920/wp.ifs.2024.4333

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Primary school students in the tenth percentile of the family income distribution did 1 hour and 10 minutes less learning per day than a child from a family in the 90th percentile of the income distribution.

    “and 1 hour and 10 minutes less that a child from a family in the 90th percentile of the income distribution.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Andrew et al. (2020)

  • Primary school students in the tenth percentile of the family income distribution did about 35 minutes less learning per day than those from median-income families.

    “Andrew et al. (2020) survey parents in the first period of English school closures and find that primary school students in the tenth percentile of the family income distribution did about 35 minutes less learning per day than those from medianincome families”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Andrew et al. (2020)

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrew, A., Cattan, S., Costa Dias, M., Farquharson, C., Kraftman, L., Krutikova, S., Phimister, A., & Sevilla, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Fiscal Studies (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Publisher
The IFS
Published
2020-08-17
OpenAlex
W4403177053
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nuffield Foundation
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M010147/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Social impacts of COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
home-based learning, COVID-19 lockdown, children's time use, educational inequality, school closures, children's experiences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review