The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Zealand Journal of Ecology
Open accessAbstract
Globally, rapid human-caused climate change is posing one of the greatest emerging pressures on species and ecosystems.Uncertainty remains about how species will react to changing climate, particularly how vulnerable or adaptable and resilient they will be to changes and whether they can move to remaining favourable habitats.Here we report on a rapid trait-based climate change vulnerability assessment for all bat taxa resident in Aotearoa New Zealand.We use 16 traits across three dimensions (sensitivity, low adaptive capacity, exposure) that could make bats highly vulnerable to climate change, review the potential consequences on their long-term population viability and recommend research required to understand vulnerability and potential adaptive management requirements.We assessed all five known endemic bat taxa under two greenhouse gas concentration scenarios (representative concentration pathways: RCP4.5, RCP8.5) for two future time periods (2040, 2090).One taxon (the greater short-tailed bat Mystacina robusta) was categorised as Highly Vulnerable by 2040 under RCP4.5, and the other four taxa demonstrated Latent Risk profiles, indicating they should be monitored closely to determine whether their potential responses to projected climate change happen earlier than 2090.All taxa were categorised as Highly Vulnerable by 2090 under the high emission RCP8.5 scenario.Although no overall conclusion can be reached about whether climate change will have positive, negative or mixed consequences for bats, the likely negative consequences include increased risk of predation, reduced availability and quality of roosting and foraging habitats, and increased thermal stress.Future research should focus on understanding the costs and benefits of changing climate on productivity and survival of bats and determining if management responses are desirable and feasible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation
Ewers, R. M., & Didham, R. K. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006949 · Cited by 2,218
Are New Zealand stream ecosystems really different?
Winterbourn, M. J., Rounick, J. S., & Cowie, B. (1981) · New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1080/00288330.1981.9515927 · Cited by 441
The chronology of colonization in New Zealand
Anderson, A. (1991) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00080510 · Cited by 301
Patch dynamics and environmental heterogeneity in lotic ecosystems
Winemiller, K. O., Flecker, A. S., & Hoeinghaus, D. J. (2010) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/08-048.1 · Cited by 266
Ornamental Plants as Invasive Aliens: Problems and Solutions in Kruger National Park, South Africa
Foxcroft, L. C., Richardson, D. M., & Wilson, J. R. U. (2008) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-007-9027-9 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Venue
- New Zealand Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- New Zealand Ecological Society
- Published
- 2022-02-13
- ISSN
- 0110-6465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4238452205
- Cited by
- 2,158
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Zealand Journal of Ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20417/nzjecol
- The paper
- New Zealand Journal of Ecology. (2022). New Zealand Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.