Cited by 103E-Government and Public ServicesSmart Cities and TechnologiesResearch Data Management Practices

Benefits and risks of open government data

Open access
Kucera, Jan, Chlapek, Dusan·2014·Journal of Systems Integration

Abstract

Public sector bodies maintain a large amount of data from various domains. This data represents a potential resource that organizations and individuals can use to enhance their own datasets or which can be used to develop new and innovative products and services. In order to foster the reuse of the data held by the public sector bodies a number of countries around the world has started to publish its data according to the Open Data principles. In this paper we present a set of benefits that can be achieved by publishing Open Government Data (OGD) and a set of risks that should be assessed when a dataset is considered for opening up. Benefits and risks presented in this paper were mostly identified during two of our OGD activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20470/jsi.v5i1.185

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Issues such as the unlawful disclosure of data, the infringement of trade secret protection, violations of privacy and breaches of the security of the infrastructure might have a severe negative impact.

    “Issues such as the unlawful disclosure of data, the infringement of trade secret protection, violations of privacy and breaches of the security of the infrastructure might have a severe negative impact.”
  • There are risks related to the publication of open data that should be managed.

    “Besides the benefits of open data for governments, citizens and businesses, there are also risks related to its publication that should be managed [41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kucera, J., & Chlapek, D.
Affiliations
Prague University of Economics and Business (CZ)
Venue
Journal of Systems Integration
Published
2014
Pages
30-41
ISSN
1804-2724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1524114866
Cited by
103
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7
FWCI
41.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Systems Integration (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
open government data, open data principles, data reuse, government data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review