The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diplomasi Budaya Jepang dan Korea Selatan di Indonesia tahun 2020: Studi Komparasi
Abstract
Products of the creative industry, which falls under the category of culturalproducts, represent one of soft power instruments capable of influencingpolicy-making processes. Japan and South Korea are two states that haveimplemented internationalization strategies on their creative industryproducts in order to boost economy. In addition to becoming sectors thatcontribute to the economy, by the means of the Korean Hallyu and CoolJapan, the creative industries of Japan and South Korea have becomeinstruments of cultural diplomacy aimed at influencing public opinionson both states. In Indonesia, differences in the development strategiesimplemented by both states have influenced the degree of success in theircultural diplomacy. This research aims to identify differences betweenthe strategies implemented by Japan and South Korea in conductingcultural diplomacy in Indonesia. This research has found that the culturaldiplomacy conducted by Japan has been less successful due to the lackof incorporation of cultural values in its internationalization strategy, aswell as the lack of government support for its creative industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies comparing Japanese and Korean cultural diplomacy toward Indonesia reveal that film-based exchanges significantly enhance cross-cultural familiarity and foster emotional resonance among viewers, which in turn strengthens diplomatic relations (Islamiyah et al., 2020).”
From Cultural Soft Power: Indonesia’s Diplomacy Strategy through Music, Film, and Culinary Arts (2025) · cites this paper as Islamiyah et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Goff, Patricia M., 2013. "Cultural Diplomacy," dalam Cooper, A. F., · DOI
- J. Heine, dan R. Thakur (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of
- Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Guide. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
- Tuch, Hans N., 1990. Communicating with the World: US Public · DOI
- Diplomacy Overseas. New York: St. Martin's Press.
- Comparative Public Diplomacy Studies," Andalas Journal of
- International Studies, 1(2): 182-198.
- Culture and Society," The Journal of Popular Culture, 38(3):
- Sociology, 2(3): 196-202.
- University Press, 13: 41-47.
- in Presidential Speeches," International Journal of
- Nye, Joseph S., 2008. "Public Diplomacy and Soft Power," The · DOI
- Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social
- Science, 616 (1): 94-109.
- Padjajaran, 1(1): 24.
- Figueroa Press.
Cited by
Cultural Soft Power: Indonesia’s Diplomacy Strategy through Music, Film, and Culinary Arts
Nurjanah, N. (2025) · Kamara Journal · doi:10.62872/kj.v2i3.476
Metadata
- Authors
- Islamiyah, A. N., Priyanto, N. M., & Prabhandari, N. P. D.
- Venue
- Jurnal Hubungan Internasional
- Publisher
- Universitas Airlangga
- Published
- 2020-11-28
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257
- ISSN
- 2715-1565
- 1411-9382
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diplomasi Budaya Jepang dan Korea Selatan di Indonesia tahun 2020: Studi Komparasi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20473/jhi.v13i2.21644
- The paper
- Islamiyah, A. N., Priyanto, N. M., & Prabhandari, N. P. D. (2020). Diplomasi Budaya Jepang dan Korea Selatan di Indonesia tahun 2020: Studi Komparasi. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional. https://doi.org/10.20473/jhi.v13i2.21644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
