Cited by 6Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAI and HR TechnologiesSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Artificial intelligence skepticism in career domains

Open access
Adepoju, Oluwaseun David, Tijani, Bosun, Karera, Steven·2024·International Journal for Digital Society

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked diverse and conflicting perspectives within academia, technological thought leaders, and corporate sectors, particularly regarding its impact on the future of work.Amidst these varied sentiments, a prevailing theme emerges caution.Both optimistic and pessimistic viewpoints on AI consistently emphasize the importance of exercising caution as we navigate the development and exploration of this technology.This article presents a comprehensive examination, incorporating deep empirical literature review, text analysis, and sentiment analysis.The study conducted the transcription and summarization of ten YouTube videos that discussed the implications of AI on job and career growth.Subsequently, sentiment analysis was conducted using ChatGPT, an AI chatbot, and a sentiment analysis formula was employed to calculate the sentiment average.The findings indicate a prevailing sentiment of cautious optimism, with a sentiment average of 0.35.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2024.0236

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In professional contexts, skepticism often centers on ethical concerns.

    “In these contexts and others, skepticism often centers on ethical concerns that take many shapes and forms (Adepoju et al., 2024; Ambartsoumean and Yampolskiy, 2023).”

    From From avoidance to adoption: strategies for integrating AI in higher education contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Adepoju et al., 2024

    Section 3, “Human Skepticism on Modern Technologies in the Workplace” (page unavailable), links workplace skepticism to concerns about job security, work-life balance, and personal privacy. Privacy is an ethical concern, but the paper does not establish that skepticism often centers on ethical concerns or characterize them as taking many forms. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Skepticism toward AI is not confined to education but is shared across professional domains such as medicine, law, and economics.

    “At the broadest level, skepticism toward AI is not confined to education but is shared across professional domains such as medicine, law, and economics.”

    From From avoidance to adoption: strategies for integrating AI in higher education contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Adepoju et al., 2024

    Section 3 (page unavailable) discusses skepticism toward technology in workplaces, supporting the point that such skepticism is not confined to education. The Introduction discusses concerns about AI in labor economics, and Section 8 discusses AI’s implications for healthcare and law, but the copy does not establish that skepticism toward AI is shared across all three named domains. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Prejean, E., Aldredge, M., Liao, W., Kilcoyne, M., Parker, C. (2020). Lessons Learned During Turbulent Times to Weather and Thrive In The Storm Of Covid-19. Int J Innov Educ Res, 11(8), 276-288. DOI: 10.31686/ijaer.vol 8.iss 11 .2744. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adepoju, O. D., Tijani, B., & Karera, S.
Venue
International Journal for Digital Society
Published
2024-03-30
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1880-1888
ISSN
2040-2570 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390628393
Cited by
6
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal for Digital Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
future of work, job growth, cautious optimism, YouTube videos, sentiment analysis, ChatGPT, public perception of AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review