Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

School Leaders and Inclusive Education in Peru: A Case Study of Principal Leadership in an Effective Inclusive School

Valdivieso, Pamela·2020·International Journal of Innovative Business Strategies
DOI 10.20533/ijibs.2046.3626.2020.0058
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since the adoption of the inclusive education (IE) approach, the Peruvian Ministry of Education has made improvements to the normative regarding special educational needs (SEN) students.However, implementing this reform continues to present numerous challenges.A recent study of the IE policy, conducted in 2016, concluded that the key problem was the lack of sensitization and low training of school leaders and teachers which prevented them from providing a better educational service to SEN students [43].The evidence that links the role of principal leaders and IE is almost non-existent in the Peruvian context.Therefore, this qualitative case study seeks to fill this research gap by exploring the challenges, strategies, and training needs of school leaders in an inclusive school in Peru.The study was conducted in a school with a high performing school leader where it was believed that a more positive environment towards reform implementation could be found.Interview data was collected from school leaders, the administrative support staff, and teachers.The findings of this research work conclude that the selected school has been significantly successful in implementing the reform by promoting inclusive values within the school, working with the school community to improve school climate for inclusion, and developing professional learning communities to develop pedagogical strategies for inclusive teaching.This research provides important inputs for the design and implementation of leadership policies and preparation programs with attention to students with disabilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20533/ijibs.2046.3626.2020.0058

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). What Matters Most: Investing in Teaching. The School Administrator 54 (3): 44-48.
  2. Mullick, J., Deppeler, J., & Sharma, U. (2012). Inclusive Education Reform in Primary Schools of Bangladesh: Leadership Challenges and Possible Strategies to Address the Challenges. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 8(1), 1-20.
  3. Valdivieso, P. (2018). The exclusion of the inclusive: the case of the Peruvian SAANEE programme (Unpublished master's dissertation). The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Valdivieso, P.
Venue
International Journal of Innovative Business Strategies
Publisher
Infonomics Society
Published
2020-12-31
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
453-461
ISSN
2046-3626
DOI
10.20533/ijibs.2046.3626.2020.0058
Cited by
5
References
48

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.