Cited by 19Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Daily routine of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in three management systems of Tamil Nadu, India and its implications for elephant welfare

Open access
D.G.G. Arts College (Women), Mayiladuthurai - 609 001, Tamilnadu, India, Vanitha, V., Thiyagesan, K., Postgraduate and Research Department of Zoology and Wildlife Biology, A.V.C. College, Mannampandal 609305, Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu, India, Baskaran, N., Asian Nature Conservation Foundation, Innovation Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560012, India.·2010·Scientific Transactions in Enviornment and Technovation

Abstract

Under natural conditions elephants move extensively, experience complex physical, and social environments and engage in diverse activities. While in captivity their movements are restricted, activities are limited and timed for monotonous work. This study compares the daily routines of elephants managed in three captive systems in Tamil Nadu—private, temple and forest department—to understand how far their daily activities are in accordance with their natural behaviour in the wild. Data collected using focal sampling method for 77 elephants together from three systems show that the captive elephant in the private places, especially those with individual owners are put to significantly more work (7½ hours/day), mostly begging at towns and cities, with stressful walking in hot climate compared to the other two systems. The temple elephants remain in indoor enclosures for significantly longer period (16 hours/day) with very little time (<1 hour) allotted for walking/exercise. In contrast, the captive elephants in the forest department system are assigned significantly lesser time for work (2½ hours/day) and are given more time for natural feeding (13 hours/day), which they also use for other activities like resting, socializing and reproduction similar to that of wild elephants. The study suggests minimizing work duration for private elephants, and increasing the duration of exercise and bathing by reducing the time spent on resting and blessing by temple elephants, to improve their welfare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20894/stet.116.003.003.002

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D.G.G. Arts College (Women), M. 6. 0., Vanitha, V., Thiyagesan, K., Postgraduate and Research Department of Zoology and Wildlife Biology, A. V. C. C., Baskaran, N., & Asian Nature Conservation Foundation, I. C.
Venue
Scientific Transactions in Enviornment and Technovation
Published
2010-03-17
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
116-122
ISSN
  • 0973-9157 (ISSN-L)
  • 2393-9249
OpenAlex
W2187573083
Cited by
19
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
Scientific Transactions in Environment and Technovation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Asian elephant, captive elephants, daily routine, animal welfare, working hours, begging, exercise time, natural feeding, Tamil Nadu

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review