Cited by 4Cryptography and Data SecurityQuantum Information and CryptographyCryptography and Residue Arithmetic

Quantum permutation pad for quantum secure symmetric and asymmetric cryptography

Open access
Kuang, Randy·2025·Academia Quantum

Abstract

This review delves into the latest advancements in quantum-secure cryptography, focusing on the quantum permutation pad (QPP), a pivotal innovation proposed by Kuang et al. QPP harnesses the non-commutativity and generalized uncertainty derived from the Galois permutation group, making it highly suitable for cryptographic applications. The review underscores QPP’s versatility across both symmetric and asymmetric cryptography through three core representations: matrix-based for classical encryption, quantum gates for quantum-native encryption, and arithmetic-based for multivariate public key systems such as Merkle–Hellman cryptosystems, multivariate public key cryptography (MPKC), and the most recent homomorphic polynomial public key (HPPK). In particular, QPP strengthens the security of HPPK’s key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) and digital signature (DS) schemes, thus offering robust quantum resistance. This work further examines QPP’s integration with various encryption techniques for enhancing resilience against quantum attacks. By addressing challenges in cryptographic complexity, key size optimization, and security enhancement, the review presents a thorough evaluation of QPP’s role in fortifying cryptographic protocols for ensuring strong security foundations in the quantum computing era.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20935/acadquant7457

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • QPP-RNG leverages repeated Fisher-Yates shuffles by permuting an array, recording the time to sort it, and using timing fluctuations shaped by CPU, cache, and memory interactions to extract raw entropy.

    “QPP-RNG leverages the intrinsic complexity of repeated Fisher–Yates shuffles18: it permutes an array, records the time to sort it, and uses the timing fluctuations—shaped by fine-grained interactions across CPU, cache, and memory—to extract raw entropy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuang, R.
Affiliations
Quantropi (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
Kuang, Randy
Venue
Academia Quantum
Published
2025-01-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
3064-979X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406049530
Cited by
4
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Academia quantum. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Keywords
non-commutativity, symmetric encryption, public-key cryptography, multivariate public-key cryptography, Merkle-Hellman cryptosystem, key encapsulation mechanism, digital signatures, post-quantum security, quantum resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review