PreprintCited by 8Digital Economy and TransformationDigitalization and Economic Development in AgricultureEconomic Growth and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Economy, Industrial Structure Upgrade and Economic High-Quality Development: An Empirical Research Based on the Mediation Effect Model

Open access
Xu, Xiaohui, Han, Liao·2021·Preprints.org

Abstract

Based on panel data of 31 provincial-level administrative units (excluding Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) in China from 2015 to 2019, using fixed effect model and mediation effect model, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the interaction among digital economy, industrial structure upgrade and high-quality economic development. The results show that, from the overall effect, the digital economy can significantly promote the high-quality development of the economy, and there are regular regional differences, and the relationship between the promotion intensity and the development level of the digital economy is proportional. From the mediation effect, in the relationship between digital economy and high-quality economic development, the upgrade of industrial structure has played a significant part of the mediation effect, the proportion of mediation effect is 25.17% . In addition, the mediation effect of industrial structure upgrade has obvious regional difference, the western area is the strongest, the eastern area is the second, the central area is the weakest. Based on the above research,the concrete policy suggestions are given to promote the development of digital economy and upgrade the level of industrial structure to promote the high-quality development of economy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202106.0359.v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Wen Jun, Deng Peidong, Zhang Qianxiao. How does digital economy innovation reshape high-quality development path[J].Journal of the humanities, 2020, (11) : 93-103.
  2. Sheba.Mechanism and path of digital economy promoting high-quality development of urban economy[J].Journal of Xi'an Institute of Finance and Economics, 2020, (2) : 10-14.
  3. Li Hui.Digital Economy drives the transition of enterprises to high quality development[J].Journal of Xi'an Institute of Finance and Economics, 2020, (2) : 25-29.
  4. Ning Chaoshan.Digital Economy, factor marketization and high-quality Economic Development[J] . Journal of Changbai University, 2021, (1) : 114-120.
  5. Zhu Fenghui and Liu Lifeng. Industrial Structure Upgrading and high-quality economic development in China:Based on empirical data of cities at and above prefecture level[J].Journal of the Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 2020, (6) : 42-53.
  6. Shi Dan, Li Peng, Xu Ming.Industrial restructuring and upgrading and high-quality Economic Development[J].Fujian Forum (humanities and Social Sciences Edition) , 2020, (9) : 108-118.
  7. Li Taiping, Gu Yunan. Strategic Emerging Industrial Agglomeration, industrial structure upgrade and high-quality development of regional economy: An Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 14 June 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202106.0359.v1 empirical analysis based on the Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Journal of the Henan Normal University, 2021, (1) : 78-87.
  8. Wen Zhonglin and others. Intermediate Effect Test Procedure and its application[J].Journal of Psychology, 2004, (5) : 614-620.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Xu, X., & Han, L.
Affiliations
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Xiaohui
  • Han, Liao
Venue
Preprints.org
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-06-14
OpenAlex
W3170382044
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Economy and Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Development
Keywords
digital economy, industrial upgrading, high-quality economic development, mediating effect, regional variation, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review