Cited by 11Evacuation and Crowd DynamicsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

Tsukuba Challenge 2017 Dynamic Object Tracks Dataset for Pedestrian Behavior Analysis

Open access
Lambert, Jacob, Liang, Leslie, Morales, Luis Yoichi, Akai, Naoki, Carballo, Alexander, Takeuchi, Eijiro, Narksri, Patiphon, Seiya, Shunya, Takeda, Kazuya, Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan, Institute of Innovation for Future Society, Nagoya University Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan·2018·Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics

Abstract

Navigation in social environments, in the absence of traffic rules, is the difficult task at the core of the annual Tsukuba Challenge. In this context, a better understanding of the soft rules that influence social dynamics is key to improve robot navigation. Prior research attempts to model social behavior through microscopic interactions, but the resulting emergent behavior depends heavily on the initial conditions, in particular the macroscopic setting. As such, data-driven studies of pedestrian behavior in a fixed environment may provide key insight into this macroscopic aspect, but appropriate data is scarcely available. To support this stream of research, we release an open-source dataset of dynamic object trajectories localized in a map of 2017 Tsukuba Challenge environment. A data collection platform equipped with lidar, camera, IMU, and odometry repeatedly navigated the challenge’s course, recording observations of passersby. Using a background map, we localized ourselves in the environment, removed the static background from the point cloud data, clustered the remaining points into dynamic objects and tracked their movements over time. In this work, we present the Tsukuba Challenge Dynamic Object Tracks dataset, which features nearly 10,000 trajectories of pedestrians, cyclists, and other dynamic agents, in particular autonomous robots. We provide a 3D map of the environment used as global frame for all trajectories. For each trajectory, we provide at regular time i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20965/jrm.2018.p0598

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. S. Yuta, H. Hashimoto, and H. Tashiro, “Tsukuba challenge: Real world robot challenge (RWRC): Toward actual autonomous robots in our daily life,” 25th Annual Conf. of the Robotics Society of Japan, p. 3D19, September 2007.
  2. D. Helbing and P. Molnár, “Social force model for pedestrian dynamics,” Physical Review E, Vol.51, No.5, pp. 4283-4286, 1995.
  3. X. Wang, K. T. Ma, G.-W. Ng, and W. E. L. Grimson, “Trajectory analysis and semantic region modeling using a nonparametric bayesian model,” 2008 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1-8, June 2008. · DOI
  4. S. Yi, H. Li, and X. Wang, “Understanding pedestrian behaviors from stationary crowd groups,” 2015 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 3488-3496, June 2015. · DOI
  5. A. Geiger, P. Lenz, C. Stiller, and R. Urtasun, “Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset,” Int. J. of Robotics Research (IJRR), Vol.32, No.11, pp. 1231-1237, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  6. M. Cordts, M. Omran, S. Ramos, T. Rehfeld, M. Enzweiler, R. Benenson, U. Franke, S. Roth, and B. Schiele, “The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding,” Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016. · DOI · Paper page
  7. N. Schneider and D. M. Gavrila, “Pedestrian path prediction with recursive bayesian filters: A comparative study,” 35th German Conf. on Pattern Recognition (GCPR 2013), pp. 174-183, Springer, September 2013. · DOI
  8. G. J. Brostow, J. Fauqueur, and R. Cipolla, “Semantic object classes in video: A high-definition ground truth database,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., Vol.30, No.2, pp. 88-97, 2009. · DOI
  9. L. Wang, J. Shi, G. Song, and I.-F. Shen, “Object detection combining recognition and segmentation,” 8th Asian Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 189-199. Springer, November 2007. · DOI
  10. P. Dollár, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, and P. Perona, “Pedestrian detection: an evaluation of the state of the art,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., Vol.34, No.4, pp. 743-761, April 2012. · DOI
  11. A. Teichman, J. Levinson, and S. Thrun, “Towards 3D object recognition via classification of arbitrary object tracks,” 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, p. 1, 2011. · DOI
  12. M. De Deuge, A. Quadros, C. Hung, and B. Douillard, “Unsupervised feature learning for classification of outdoor 3D scans,” Proc. of Australasian Conf. on Robitics and Automation, Vol.2, p. 1, 2013.
  13. S. Yi, H. Li, and X. Wang, “Pedestrian behavior modeling from stationary crowds with applications to intelligent surveillance,” IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol.25, No.9, pp. 4354-4368, 2016. · DOI
  14. E. Takeuchi and T. Tsubouchi, “A 3-D scan matching using improved 3-D normal distributions transform for mobile robotic mapping,” 2006 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3068-3073, October 2006. · DOI
  15. S. Kato, E. Takeuchi, Y. Ishiguro, Y. Ninomiya, K. Takeda, and T. Hamada, “An open approach to autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Micro, Vol.35, No.6, pp. 60-68, November 2015. · DOI
  16. N. Akai, Y. Morales, T. Yamaguchi, E. Takeuchi, Y. Yoshihara, H. Okuda, T. Suzuki, and Y. Ninomiya, “Autonomous driving based on accurate localization using multilayer lidar and dead reckoning,” 2017 IEEE 20th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 1147-1152, October 2017.
  17. A. Hornung, K. M. Wurm, A. Bennewitz, C. Stachniss, and W. Burgard, “OctoMap: An efficient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees,” Autonomous Robots, Vol.34, No.3, 2013. · DOI
  18. R. B. Rusu, “Semantic 3D Object Maps for Everyday Manipulation in Human Living Environments,” KI – Künstliche Intelligenz, 2009. · DOI · Paper page
  19. H. W. Kuhn and B. Yaw, “The hungarian method for the assignment problem,” Naval Res. Logist. Quart, 1955. · DOI · Paper page
  20. H. Shum, M. Hebert, and K. Ikeuchi, “On 3D shape similarity,” Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 526-531, 1996. · DOI
  21. C. de Boor, “A Practical Guide to Spline,” Springer, 1978. · DOI
  22. Y. Morales, T. Kanda, and N. Hagita, “Walking together: Side by side walking model for an interacting robot,” J. of Human-Robot Interaction, Vol.3, No.2, pp. 50-73, 2014. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambert, J., Liang, L., Morales, L. Y., Akai, N., Carballo, A., Takeuchi, E., Narksri, P., Seiya, S., Takeda, K., Graduate School of Informatics, N. U. F.-C., & Institute of Innovation for Future Society, N. U. F.-C.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Institutes of Innovation for Future Society, Nagoya University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics
Published
2018-08-20
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
598-612
ISSN
  • 0915-3942 (ISSN-L)
  • 1883-8049
OpenAlex
W2886776651
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
pedestrian behavior, dynamic object tracking, social navigation, robot navigation, social dynamics, LiDAR point cloud, trajectory data, cyclists, autonomous robots, 3D map, bounding boxes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review