FOREST ESTABLISHMENT AND WATER QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AS INFLUENCED BY SPOIL TYPE ON A LOOSE-GRADED SURFACE MINE IN EASTERN KENTUCKY
Open accessAbstract
Six research plots were established on a surface mine for the purpose of evaluating the forest productivity potential and hydrological and water quality characteristics of three different loose-graded spoil types.The three spoil types were: (1) predominately brown, weathered sandstone (BROWN); (2) predominately gray, un-weathered sandstone (GRAY); and (3) mixed weathered and un-weathered sandstones and shale material (MIXED).The average area of the six plots was approximately 3,658 m 2 .The physical and chemical soil characteristics that gave the BROWN spoil type a predictably higher productivity potential and natural regeneration than the GRAY and MIXED spoil were its finer soil texture, higher CEC and P concentration, and a pH that was more suitable for native hardwood trees.Four species of tree seedlings were planted into the spoils.Growth and survival of the planted trees were evaluated for three years.As an indicator of natural succession potential, percentage ground cover of volunteer vegetation on the three spoil types was also evaluated.By the third year (2007) after planting, the BROWN spoil type had a significantly higher average tree volume index than the MIXED spoil and MIXED was significantly higher than GRAY.Ground cover from natural regeneration was found to be 66.4% on the BROWN spoil (61 different species), 5.8% on the MIXED spoil (35 different species), and less than 2.0% on the GRAY spoil (12 different species).Results showed that the loose-graded spoil in this experiment was characterized by low discharge volumes, small peak discharges, and long durations of discharge and had hydrologic characteristics of a forested watershed, even at this early stage of development.Generally, concentrations of Ca, Mg, and SO 4 2-decreased over time in GRAY and MIXED and increased in BROWN.The pH of the water discharge from all three spoil types has increased from about 7.5 to 8.5.Although the average electrical conductivity (EC) in water discharged from the BROWN spoil remained relatively level during the study period, the GRAY and MIXED appears to be on a downward trajectory from about 1500 µS cm -1 to about 500 µS cm -1 .The latter value of EC has been reported as the apparent threshold at which the benthic invertebrate community returns to drastically disturbed headwater streams of eastern Kentucky and adjacent coal-producing Appalachian states.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mine soil chemical values in Study 1 were typical for a mixture of brown and gray sandstone mine soil material and were generally suitable for chestnut tree growth.
“These values were found to be typical for a mixture of brown and gray sandstone mine soil material (Haering et al. 2004; Angel et al. 2008; Showalter et al. 2007; Emerson et al. 2009) and were generally suitable for chestnut tree growth (Wang et al. 2013).”
From Plantation performance of chestnut hybrids and progenitors on reclaimed Appalachian surface mines (2018) · cites this paper as Angel et al. 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forest restoration following surface mining disturbance: challenges and solutions
Macdonald, S. E., Landhäusser, S. M., Skousen, J., Franklin, J., Frouz, J., Hall, S., Jacobs, D. F., & Quideau, S. (2015) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-015-9506-4 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Self-citationRebuilding Soils on Mined Land for Native Forests in Appalachia
Zipper, C. E., Burger, J. A., Barton, C. D., & Skousen, J. G. (2013) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2012.0335 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationHydrologic Effects of Surface Coal Mining in Appalachia (<scp>U.S.</scp>)
Evans, D. M., Zipper, C. E., Hester, E. T., & Schoenholtz, S. H. (2015) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12322 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Sena, K., Barton, C., Hall, S., Angel, P., Agouridis, C., & Warner, R. (2015) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12164 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationAgouridis, C. T., Angel, P. N., Taylor, T. J., Barton, C. D., Warner, R. C., Yu, X., & Wood, C. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0158 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluating soil genesis and reforestation success on a surface coal mine in Appalachia
Miller, J., Barton, C., Agouridis, C., Fogel, A., Dowdy, T., & Angel, P. (2012) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2010.0400 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationSena, K., Barton, C., Angel, P., Agouridis, C., & Warner, R. (2014) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-014-2171-y · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationHardwood Tree Growth after Eight Years on Brown and Gray Mine Soils in West Virginia
Wilson-Kokes, L., Emerson, P., DeLong, C., Thomas, C., & Skousen, J. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2013.04.0113 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Hardwood Seedling Growth on Different Mine Spoil Types with and without Topsoil Amendment
Showalter, J. M., Burger, J. A., & Zipper, C. E. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0500 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Survival and Growth of Chestnut Backcross Seeds and Seedlings on Surface Mines
Skousen, J., Cook, T., Wilson-Kokes, L., & Pena-Yewtukhiw, E. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2012.0368 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Plantation performance of chestnut hybrids and progenitors on reclaimed Appalachian surface mines
Skousen, J. G., Dallaire, K., Scagline-Mellor, S., Monteleone, A., Wilson-Kokes, L., Joyce, J., Thomas, C., Keene, T., DeLong, C., Cook, T., et al. (2018) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-018-9643-7 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“These values were found to be typical for a mixture of brown and gray sandstone mine soil material (Haering et al. 2004; Angel et al. 2008; Showalter et al. 2007; Emerson et al. 2009) and were generally suitable for chestnut tree growth (Wang et al.”
BackgroundHARDWOOD TREE PERFORMANCE ON AMENDED BROWN AND GRAY MINE SPOILS AFTER FOUR YEARS
Thomas, C., & Skousen, J. (2011) · Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation · doi:10.21000/jasmr11010655 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Young forest composition and growth on a reclaimed Appalachian coal surface mine after nine years
VA Tech, B., Zipper, C. E., Burger, J. A., Evans, D. M., & Donovan, P. (2012) · Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation · doi:10.21000/jasmr12010056 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Angel, P. N., Barton, C. D., Warner, R. C., Agouridis, C., Taylor, T., & Hall, S. L.
- Affiliations
- United States Department of the Interior (US)
- Venue
- Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation
- Published
- 2008-06-30
- Volume
- 2008
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-65
- ISSN
- 2328-8744 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2320512311
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- University of Kentucky
- U.S. Forest Service
- Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
- Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
- Keywords
- surface mine reclamation, sandstone weathering, natural regeneration, ground cover, water quality, mine drainage, hydrology, electrical conductivity, benthic invertebrates, coal mining, eastern Kentucky coalfields, soil cation exchange capacity, phosphorus, pH
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review