Cited by 51Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationProblem and Project Based LearningOphthalmology and Visual Health Research

Artificial intelligence-tutoring problem-based learning in ophthalmology clerkship

Open access
Wu, Dongxuan, Xiang, Yifan, Wu, Xiaohang, Yu, Tongyong, Huang, Xiucheng, Zou, Yuxian, Liu, Zhenzhen, Lin, Haotian·2020·Annals of Translational Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is an increasingly popular tool in medical investigations. However, AI's potential of aiding medical teaching has not been explored. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-tutoring problem-based-learning (PBL) in ophthalmology clerkship and to assess the student evaluations of this module. METHODS: Thirty-eight Grade-two students in ophthalmology clerkship at Sun Yat-Sen University were randomly assigned to two groups. In Group A, students learned congenital cataracts through an AI-tutoring PBL module by exploring and operating an AI diagnosis platform. In Group B, students learned congenital cataracts through traditional lecture given with the same faculty. The improvement in student performance was evaluated by comparing the pre- and post-lecture scores of a specific designed test using paired-T tests. Student evaluations of AI-tutoring PBL were measured by a 17-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The post-lecture scores were significantly higher than the pre-lecture scores in both groups (Group A: P<0.0001, Group B: P<0.0001). The improvement of group A in the part of sign and diagnosis test (Part I) was more significant than that of group B (P=0.016). However, there was no difference in the improvement in the part of treatment plan test (Part II) between two groups (P=0.556). Overall, all respondents were satisfied and agreed that AI-tutoring PBL was helpful, effective, motive and beneficial to help develop critical and creative thinking. CONCLUSIONS: The application of AI-tutoring PBL into ophthalmology clerkship improved students' performance and satisfaction. AI-tutoring PBL teaching showed advantage in promoting students' understanding of signs of diseases. The instructors play an indispensable role in AI-tutoring PBL curriculum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/atm.2019.12.15

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI can formulate its own different sets of case scenarios to assess the learner's knowledge.

    “If all the details of case data are already filled in, AI can formulate its own different sets of case scenarios to assess the learner's knowledge [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, D., Xiang, Y., Wu, X., Yu, T., Huang, X., Zou, Y., Liu, Z., & Lin, H.
Affiliations
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Zhenzhen
Venue
Annals of Translational Medicine
Published
2020-06
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
700-700
ISSN
  • 2305-5839 (ISSN-L)
  • 2305-5847
OpenAlex
W2997244174
Cited by
51
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Annals of Translational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873675)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Keywords
problem-based learning, congenital cataract, medical education, student satisfaction, treatment planning, critical and creative thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review