Cited by 25Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationInnovations in Medical Education

Artificial Intelligence developments in medical education: a conceptual and practical framework

Open access
Masters, Ken·2020·MedEdPublish

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. As Artificial Intelligence (AI) develops in medicine, there is a greater awareness that medical education may also benefit from AI. Many AI projects are already underway, and many more are still to come. Most medical education administrators and educators are aware of AI, but are not necessarily familiar enough with it to understand the areas of possible application in both using AI in medical education, and also in the content areas that need to be raised with their students. As such, they are at a disadvantage of not understanding the current lie of the land, and are at an even greater disadvantage of not being able to influence and guide future AI projects. This paper attempts to provide an AI conceptual and practical framework for medical education administrators and educators, so that they may have a clearer understanding of the current situation, and may be better placed to guide future AI developments to meet their needs in medical education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15694/mep.2020.000239.1

Cites

45 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Alban M. and Mauricio D. (2019) Neural Networks to Predict Dropout at the Universities. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing. 9(2), pp. 149– 153. 10.18178/ijmlc.2019.9.2.779 · DOI
  2. Babić I. Đ. (2017) Machine learning methods in predicting the student academic motivation. Croatian Operational Research Review. 8, pp. 443– 461.
  3. Baker M. Harrison I. and Muir Gray. (2006) Safer IT in a safer NHS: account of a partnership. The British Journal of Healthcare Computing & Information Management. 23(7), pp. 11– 14.
  4. Becker H. S. and Geer B. (1958) The Fate of Idealism in Medical School. American Sociological Review. 23(1), p. 50. 10.2307/2088623 · DOI
  5. Billinghurst M. and Savage J. (1996) Adding intelligence to the interface.in Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium. Santa Clara, CA: IEEE, pp. 168– 175.
  6. Chen C.-K. (2010) Curriculum Assessment Using Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine Modeling Approaches: A Case Study. IR Applications. 29, pp. 1– 23.
  7. Clarke A. C. (1980) Electronic Tutors. OMNI. 2(9), pp. 76– 96.
  8. Jović J. Milić M. Cvetanović S. and Chandra K. (2019) Implementation of machine learning based methods in elearning systems.in The 10th International Conference on eLearning (eLearning-2019), 26-27 September. Belgrade, Serbia, pp. 39– 44.
  9. Laleye F. de Chalendar G. Blanié A. Brouquet A. (2020) A French Medical Conversations Corpus Annotated for a Virtual Patient Dialogue System.in Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), Marseille, 11-16 May 2020. European Language Resources Association, pp. 574– 580.
  10. Macrae H. Cohen M. Hashimoto D. and Miller B. (2020) Innovation in Surgical Education Technologies: COVID-19 and Beyond.in AMEE 2020: The Virtual Conference. AMEE 2020. Glasgow, Scotland: AMEE.
  11. Mosier K. L. and Skitka L. J. (1996) Human Decision Makers and Automated Decision Aids: Made for Each Other?in Parasuraman R. and Mouloua M. (eds) Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 201– 220.
  12. National Research Council (2015) Training Students to Extract Value from Big Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 10.17226/18981 26065052 · DOI
  13. Oancea B. Dragoescu R. and Ciucu S. (2013) Predicting students’ results in higher education using neural networks.in International Conference on Applied Information and Communication Technology. Jelgava, Latvia, pp. 190– 193.
  14. Sharples M. Jeffery N. Teather D. Teather B. (1997) A socio-cognitive engineering approach to the development of a knowledge-based training system for neuroradiology.in Du Boulay B. and Mizoguchi R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Media in Learning Systems. Proceedings of AI-ED 97, 8th world conference, Kobe, Japan, August 18-22, 1997. Kobe, Japan: IOS Press, pp. 402– 409.
  15. Skorikov M. and Momen S. (2020) Machine learning approach to predicting the acceptance of academic papers.in The 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industry 4.0, Artificial Intelligence, and Communications Technology (IAICT), Bali, July 7-9, 2020. Bali: IEEE, pp. 113– 117.
  16. Stasiu R. K. Britto J. de Dias J. da S. and Scalabrin E. (2001) Electrocardiogram Interpretation Guided by a Tutorial Expert.in 14th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. Bethesda, MD: IEEE, pp. 487– 492.
  17. Toivonen T. Jormanainen I. and Tukiainen M. (2019) Augmented intelligence in educational data mining. Smart Learning Environments. 6(1), p. 10. 10.1186/s40561-019-0086-1 · DOI
  18. Wijayarathna G. K. and Zary N. (2019) Feasibility in using de-identified patient data to enrich artificial applications in medical education. EDULEARN19 Proceedings. 1(July), pp. 7598– 7604. 10.21125/edulearn.2019.1837 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masters, K.
Affiliations
Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Corresponding author
Masters, Ken
Venue
MedEdPublish
Published
2020
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
239-239
ISSN
2312-7996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095977225
Cited by
25
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • MedEdPublish (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, medical education, artificial intelligence in education, artificial intelligence in healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review