The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in lumbar spinal fusion—a literature review
Open accessAbstract
Over the past several decades, there has been an upward trend in the total number of spinal fusion procedures worldwide. Advanced spinal fusion techniques with or without internal fixation, additional innovations in surgical approaches, innovative implants including a wide variety of interbody devices, and new alternatives in bone grafting materials are some reasons for the increasing number of spine fusion procedures. Moreover, the indications for spinal fusion have broadened over time. Initially developed for the treatment of instability and deformity due to tuberculosis, scoliosis, and traumatic injury, spinal fusion surgery has now a wide range of indications like spondylolisthesis, congenital or degenerative deformity, spinal tumors, and pseudarthrosis, with degenerative disorders as the most common indication. This review emphasizes current lumbar fusion techniques and their development in the past decades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patchell, R. A., Tibbs, P. A., Regine, W. F., Payne, R., Saris, S., Kryscio, R. J., Mohiuddin, M., & Young, B. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66954-1 · Cited by 2,388
Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration
T., A., & C., J. (2001) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s005860100282 · Cited by 1,751
Mobbs, R. J., Phan, K. H., Malham, G. M., Seex, K. A., & Rao, P. J. (2015) · PubMed · doi:10.3978/j.issn.2414-469x.2015.10.05 · Cited by 1,310
Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions
Oryan, A., Alidadi, S., Moshiri, A., & Maffulli, N. (2014) · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · doi:10.1186/1749-799x-9-18 · Cited by 1,234
A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2
James, A. W., LaChaud, G., Shen, J., Asatrian, G., Nguyen, V., Zhang, X., Ting, K., & Soo, C. (2016) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0357 · Cited by 1,131
Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice
Campana, V., Milano, G., Pagano, E., Barba, M., Cicione, C., Salonna, G., Lattanzi, W., & Logroscino, G. (2014) · Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2 · Cited by 1,117
Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008
Rajaee, S. S., Bae, H. W., Kanim, L. E. A., & Delamarter, R. B. (2012) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e31820cccfb · Cited by 1,041
United States Trends in Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Conditions
Deyo, R. A., Gray, D. T., Kreuter, W., Mirza, S., & Martin, B. I. (2005) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a · Cited by 1,000
United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003
Weinstein, J. N., Lurie, J. D., Olson, P. R., Bronner, K. K., & Fisher, E. S. (2006) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000248132.15231.fe · Cited by 895
Weinstein, J. N., Lurie, J. D., Tosteson, T. D., Zhao, W., Blood, E. A., Tosteson, A. N., Birkmeyer, N., Herkowitz, H., Longley, M., Lenke, L., et al. (2009) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.h.00913 · Cited by 629
Metadata
- Authors
- Reisener, M.-J., Pumberger, M., Shue, J., Girardi, F. P., & Hughes, A. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Spine Surgery
- Publisher
- AME Publishing Company
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 752-761
- ISSN
- 2414-4630 (ISSN-L)
- 2414-469X
- OpenAlex
- W3023278774
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in lumbar spinal fusion—a literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21037/jss-20-492
- The paper
- Reisener, M.-J., Pumberger, M., Shue, J., Girardi, F. P., & Hughes, A. P. (2020). Trends in lumbar spinal fusion—a literature review. Journal of Spine Surgery. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
