The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions
Open accessAbstract
This review analyzes the literature of bone grafts and introduces tissue engineering as a strategy in this field of orthopedic surgery. We evaluated articles concerning bone grafts; analyzed characteristics, advantages, and limitations of the grafts; and provided explanations about bone-tissue engineering technologies. Many bone grafting materials are available to enhance bone healing and regeneration, from bone autografts to graft substitutes; they can be used alone or in combination. Autografts are the gold standard for this purpose, since they provide osteogenic cells, osteoinductive growth factors, and an osteoconductive scaffold, all essential for new bone growth. Autografts carry the limitations of morbidity at the harvesting site and limited availability. Allografts and xenografts carry the risk of disease transmission and rejection. Tissue engineering is a new and developing option that had been introduced to reduce limitations of bone grafts and improve the healing processes of the bone fractures and defects. The combined use of scaffolds, healing promoting factors, together with gene therapy, and, more recently, three-dimensional printing of tissue-engineered constructs may open new insights in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zoledronic Acid and Clinical Fractures and Mortality after Hip Fracture
Lyles, K. W., Colón-Emeric, C. S., Magaziner, J. S., Adachi, J. D., Pieper, C. F., Mautalen, C., Hyldstrup, L., Recknor, C., Nordsletten, L., Moore, K. A., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa074941 · Cited by 2,003
Billiet, T., Gevaert, E., De Schryver, T., Cornelissen, M., & Dubruel, P. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 · Cited by 1,015 · cited 1×
“[151] reported on the combined efforts of material chemistry, engineering, and biology as a systemic approach for the fabrication of high-viability 3Dprinted macroporous gelatin methacrylamide constructs.”
BackgroundBrown, B. N., Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., McCabe, G. P., & Badylak, S. F. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.040 · Cited by 896 · cited 5×
“in terms of acceptance or rejection [30,31].”
BackgroundInfluentialImmune response to biologic scaffold materials
Badylak, S. F., & Gilbert, T. W. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.003 · Cited by 857
Macrophage Participation in the Degradation and Remodeling of Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds
Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., Gilbert, T. W., & Badylak, S. F. (2009) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0419 · Cited by 356
Cellulose and collagen derived micro-nano structured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Aravamudhan, A., Ramos, D. M., Nip, J., Harmon, M. D., James, R., Deng, M., Laurencin, C. T., Yu, X., & Kumbar, S. G. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology · doi:10.1166/jbn.2013.1574 · Cited by 113
Akkouch, A., Zhang, Z., & Rouabhia, M. (2014) · Journal of Biomaterials Applications · doi:10.1177/0885328213486705 · Cited by 76
Cited by
Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration
Tang, D., Tare, R. S., Yang, L.-Y., Williams, D. F., Ou, K.-L., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024 · Cited by 613
Bioactive hydrogels for bone regeneration
Bai, X., Gao, M., Syed, S., Zhuang, J., Xu, X., & Zhang, X.-Q. (2018) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.05.006 · Cited by 556
Oryan, A., Kamali, A., Moshiri, A., Baharvand, H., & Daemi, H. (2018) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.184 · Cited by 500
Self-citationNatural and Synthetic Polymers for Bone Scaffolds Optimization
Donnaloja, F., Jacchetti, E., Soncini, M., & Raimondi, M. T. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12040905 · Cited by 324
Parmaksiz, M., Dogan, A., Odabas, S., Elçin, A. E., & Elçin, Y. M. (2016) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-6041/11/2/022003 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Oryan, A., Alidadi, S., Moshiri, A., & Maffulli, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- Published
- 2014-03-17
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-18
- ISSN
- 1749-799X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111195311
- Cited by
- 1,234
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 39.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1749-799x-9-18
- The paper
- Oryan, A., Alidadi, S., Moshiri, A., & Maffulli, N. (2014). Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799x-9-18
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
