Cited by 152Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Federated learning: A collaborative effort to achieve better medical imaging models for individual sites that have small labelled datasets

Open access
Ng, Dianwen, Lan, Xiang, Yao, Melissa Min-Szu, Chan, Wing P., Feng, Mengling·2021·Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Abstract

Despite the overall success of using artificial intelligence (AI) to assist radiologists in performing computer-aided patient diagnosis, it remains challenging to build good models with small datasets at individual sites. Because many medical images do not come with proper labelling for training, this requires radiologists to perform strenuous labelling work and to prepare the dataset for training. Placing such demands on radiologists is unsustainable, given the ever-increasing number of medical images taken each year. We propose an alternative solution using a relatively new learning framework. This framework, called federated learning, allows individual sites to train a global model in a collaborative effort. Federated learning involves aggregating training results from multiple sites to create a global model without directly sharing datasets. This ensures that patient privacy is maintained across sites. Furthermore, the added supervision obtained from the results of partnering sites improves the global model's overall detection abilities. This alleviates the issue of insufficient supervision when training AI models with small datasets. Lastly, we also address the major challenges of adopting federated learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/qims-20-595

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Together with real-time analytics enabled by GPU/FPGAs, model compression, and edge computing, these developments form a transforming ecosystem in degenerative joint disease management that allows timely, individualized, clinically significant AI interventions.

    “Together with real-time analytics enabled by GPU/FPGAs, model compression, and edge computing, these developments form a transforming ecosystem in degenerative joint disease management that allows timely, individualized, clinically significant AI interventions [184] (Table 2).”

    From Biomarker-Guided Imaging and AI-Augmented Diagnosis of Degenerative Joint Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [184]

    The paper’s conclusion (page not available in our copy) discusses federated learning as a way to improve medical-imaging AI models across institutions. Searches for GPU/FPGAs, model compression, edge computing, and individualized interventions found no passage addressing real-time analytics or degenerative joint disease management. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite the general success of AI in diagnosis, it is still challenging to build an effective model with minimal datasets at particular sites.

    “Despite the general success of AI in diagnosis, it is still challenging to build an effective model with minimal datasets, at particular sites.”
  • By collectively building a global model for the prediction of brain age, the FL paradigm in the neuroimaging domain works effectively.

    “By collectively building a global model for the prediction of brain age, the FL paradigm in the neuroimaging domain works effectively.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, D., Lan, X., Yao, M. M.-S., Chan, W. P., & Feng, M.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Wan Fang Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Chan, Wing P.
  • Feng, Mengling
Venue
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Published
2021-02
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
852-857
ISSN
  • 2223-4292 (ISSN-L)
  • 2223-4306
OpenAlex
W3099081599
Cited by
152
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (AISG-GC-2019-002)
  • National Research Foundation Singapore (AISG-GC-2019-002)
  • National University Health System (WBS R-608-000-199-733)
  • National Medical Research Council (HSRG-OC17nov004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
federated learning, diagnostic imaging, data privacy, multi-site collaboration, global model aggregation, radiology, computer-aided diagnosis, limited supervision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review