Cited by 67Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Federated Learning for Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review

Open access
Dhade, Pallavi, Shirke, Prajakta·2024·RAiSE-2023

Abstract

Recent advancements in deep learning for healthcare and computer-aided laboratory services have sparked a renewed interest in making medical data more accessible. Elevating the quality of healthcare services and delivering improved patient care necessitates a knowledge base rooted in data-driven insights. Deep learning models have proven to excel in this regard, as they are specifically designed to embrace a data-driven approach. These models thrive on exposure to larger datasets, which enables them to continuously improve their performance. However, as healthcare organizations strive to aggregate clinical records onto central servers to construct robust deep learning models, concerns surrounding privacy, data ownership, and legal restrictions have emerged. Safeguarding sensitive medical data while harnessing collective knowledge from multiple healthcare centers is a challenging balancing act. One promising approach to address these concerns is the use of privacy-preserving techniques that allow for the utilization of data from multiple centers without compromising security. Federated learning (FL) is a technique that has emerged to enable the deployment of large machine learning models trained across multiple data centers without the necessity of sharing sensitive information. In this article, we present the most recent findings derived from a systematic literature review focusing on the application of federated learning in healthcare settings. This review offers insights into the current state of research and practical implementations of FL within the healthcare domain. By leveraging federated learning, healthcare institutions can harness the collective power of their data while upholding privacy and data security standards, ultimately leading to more effective and data-driven healthcare solutions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/engproc2023059230

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a multi-hospital diabetes research, federated learning decreased the risk of data breaches by 40% while also improving predicted outcomes by 15% in electronic health record analysis as compared to centralized machine learning.

    “For example, in a multi-hospital managing diabetes research, FL decreased the risk of data breaches by 40% while also improving predicted outcomes by 15% in EHR analysis as compared to centralized ML [4,34].”

    From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [34]

    Section 1.2 (page unavailable) says hospitals can train federated models without transmitting patient data and that this lessens security concerns. The copy does not report a multi-hospital diabetes study, a 40% reduction in breach risk, or a 15% improvement in EHR predictions compared with centralized ML. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Halepmollası, R.; Zeybel, M.; Eyvaz, E.; Arkan, R.; Genc, A.; Bilgen, I.; Haklidir, M. Towards Federated Learning in Identification of Medical Images: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the Conference: II International Artificial Intelligence in Health Congress, Izmir, Turkey, 16-18 April 2021.
  2. Veiga, R.; Both, C.B.; Medeiros, I.; Rosário, D.; Cerqueira, E. A Federated Learning Approach for Authentication and User Identification based on Behavioral Biometrics. In Anais do XLI Simpósio Brasileiro de Redes de Computadores e Sistemas Distribuídos; SBC: Brasília, Brazil, 2023; pp. 15-28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhade, P., & Shirke, P.
Affiliations
  • Savitribai Phule Pune University (IN)
  • Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Sandip University, Nashik 422213, Maharashtra, India
Corresponding author
Dhade, Pallavi
Venue
RAiSE-2023
Publisher
MDPI
Published
2024-02-09
Pages
230
OpenAlex
W4391748641
Cited by
67
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 13
FWCI
19.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Recent Advances in Science and Engineering (RAiSE) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
federated learning, health care, privacy-preserving machine learning, medical data security, data ownership, data-driven healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review