The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generating Political Priority for Maternal Mortality Reduction in 5 Developing Countries
Open accessAbstract
I conducted case studies on the level of political priority given to maternal mortality reduction in 5 countries: Guatemala, Honduras, India, Indonesia, and Nigeria. Among the factors that shaped political priority were international agency efforts to establish a global norm about the unacceptability of maternal death; those agencies’ provision of financial and technical resources; the degree of cohesion among national safe motherhood policy communities; the presence of national political champions to promote the cause; the deployment of credible evidence to show policymakers a problem existed; the generation of clear policy alternatives to demonstrate the problem was surmountable; and the organization of attention-generating events to create national visibility for the issue. The experiences of these 5 countries offer guidance on how political priority can be generated for other health causes in developing countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00119-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/heapol/czh053 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00105.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01184.x · DOI
- Shiffman J, Ved R. The state of political priority for safe motherhood in India. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. In press.
- 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00373-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)90188-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9256.00086 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13501768880000051 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0020818300001442 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1974.tb01136.x · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1974.tb01136.x
- 10.2105/AJPH.89.4.480 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.021 · DOI
- Banerji D. Alma-Ata showed the route to effective resource allocations for health. Bull World Health Organ . 2004;82:707–708.
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17026-8 · DOI
- Registrar General of India. Sample Registration Bulletin 33:1. New Delhi, India: Office of the Registrar General; 1999.
Cited by
Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low-income and middle-income countries
Saraceno, B., van Ommeren, M., Batniji, R., Cohen, A., Gureje, O., Mahoney, J., Sridhar, D., & Underhill, C. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61263-x · Cited by 1,088
Gilson, L., & Raphaely, N. (2008) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czn019 · Cited by 404
Kuruvilla, S., Hinton, R., Boerma, T., Bunney, R., Casamitjana, N., Cortez, R., Fracassi, P., Franz-Vasdeki, J., Helldén, D., McManus, J., et al. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k4771 · Cited by 153
Hendriks, A.-M., Jansen, M. W., Gubbels, J. S., De Vries, N. K., Paulussen, T., & Kremers, S. P. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-46 · Cited by 68
The village-based midwife programme in Indonesia
Shankar, A., Sebayang, S., Guarenti, L., Utomo, B., Islam, M., Fauveau, V., & Jalal, F. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60538-3 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Shiffman, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 796-803
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2163352017
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generating Political Priority for Maternal Mortality Reduction in 5 Developing Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.2006.095455
- The paper
- Shiffman, J. (2007). Generating Political Priority for Maternal Mortality Reduction in 5 Developing Countries. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2006.095455
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.