The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influence of Implicit Bias on Treatment Recommendations for 4 Common Pediatric Conditions: Pain, Urinary Tract Infection, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and Asthma
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. We examined the association between pediatricians’ attitudes about race and treatment recommendations by patients’ race. Methods. We conducted an online survey of academic pediatricians (n = 86). We used 3 Implicit Association Tests to measure implicit attitudes and stereotypes about race. Dependent variables were recommendations for pain management, urinary tract infections, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and asthma, measured by case vignettes. We used correlational analysis to assess associations among measures and hierarchical multiple regression to measure the interactive effect of the attitude measures and patients’ race on treatment recommendations. Results. Pediatricians’ implicit (unconscious) attitudes and stereotypes were associated with treatment recommendations. The association between unconscious bias and patient’s race was statistically significant for prescribing a narcotic medication for pain following surgery. As pediatricians’ implicit pro-White bias increased, prescribing narcotic medication decreased for African American patients but not for the White patients. Self-reported attitudes about race were associated with some treatment recommendations. Conclusions. Pediatricians’ implicit attitudes about race affect pain management. There is a need to better understand the influence of physicians’ unconscious beliefs about race on pain and other areas of care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“eight articles appeared to refer to the same data collected in a single cross-country comparison study [27–32, 34, 35] and a further two articles analysed the same data [45, 47].”
From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Four studies examining the correlation between IAT scores and responses to clinical vignettes found a significant correlation between high levels of pro-white implicit bias and treatment responses that favoured patients specified as white [42, 45–47].”
From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Self-citationImplicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62 · Cited by 1,567
Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection in Childhood: A Meta-Analysis
Shaikh, N., Morone, N. E., Bost, J. E., & Farrell, M. H. (2008) · Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · doi:10.1097/inf.0b013e31815e4122 · Cited by 943
Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology
Burgess, D., van Ryn, M., Dovidio, J., & Saha, S. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0160-1 · Cited by 495
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Bloom B, 2010, Vital Health Stat 10, 247, 1
- 10.1542/peds.2010-0188 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1087054705280413 · DOI · Paper page
- Smedley BD, 2003, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care
- 10.1367/A04-203R1.1 · DOI
- 10.1353/hpu.0.0236 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2007.64 · DOI
- 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.100 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.108.2.432 · DOI
- 10.1089/cap.2005.15.88 · DOI
- 10.1353/hpu.0.0255 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00527.x · DOI
- 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215901.37144.94 · DOI
- 10.1353/hpu.2008.0005 · DOI
- 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181792562 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-006-0057-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.036 · DOI
- 10.1353/hpu.0.0063 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.94.12.2084 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2105/AJPH.93.2.248 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9280.00262 · DOI
- 10.1080/10463280701489053 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/hpu.0.0185 · DOI · Paper page
- Nosek BA, 2007, Automatic Processes in Social Thinking and Behavior, 265
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167205275613 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0015575 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181653d58 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00008 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715 · DOI
- Chapman GB, 2000, Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology and Applications
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/20439056 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · DOI · Paper page
- Cohen J, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
- 10.1542/peds.108.4.1033 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11606-010-1555-y · DOI
- 10.1197/aemj.9.11.1184 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00105.x · DOI
- 10.1370/afm.282 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
FitzGerald, C., & Hurst, S. (2017) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8 · Cited by 2,556
“Moreover, eight articles appeared to refer to the same data collected in a single cross-country comparison study [27–32, 34, 35] and a further two articles analysed the same data [45, 47].”
BackgroundHall, W. J., Chapman, M. V., Lee, K. M., Merino, Y. M., Thomas, T. W., Payne, B. K., Eng, E., Day, S. H., & Coyne-Beasley, T. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302903 · Cited by 2,176
“However, 2 studies also reported that their samples of professionals associated highquality medical care, as opposed to low-quality care, more with Black Americans than with White Americans.38,39 Thus, these 4 studies revealed that, overall, health care professionals associated Black Americans with being less cooperat…”
BackgroundCDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain — United States, 2022
Dowell, D., Ragan, K. R., Jones, C. M., Baldwin, G. T., & Chou, R. (2022) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1 · Cited by 1,886
Havranek, E. P., Mujahid, M. S., Barr, D. A., Blair, I. V., Cohen, M. S., Cruz-Flores, S., Davey-Smith, G., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C. R., Lauer, M. S., Lockwood, D. W., et al. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000228 · Cited by 1,472
Physicians and Implicit Bias: How Doctors May Unwittingly Perpetuate Health Care Disparities
Chapman, E. N., Kaatz, A., & Carnes, M. L. (2013) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2441-1 · Cited by 1,386
“Others have confirmed that even in the absence of explicit race bias, implicit preference for Whites among physicians is common.(29,30) The degree of implicit race bias varies by physician race and gender.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Sabin, J. A., & Greenwald, A. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 988-995
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC3483921
- OpenAlex
- W2078029714
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 61.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- American Journal of Public Health
- Funders
- University of Washington
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R36 HS015676, 1-R36HS1576-01)
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH20010, T32MH020010)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Keywords
- implicit bias, racial bias in medicine, pediatricians, treatment guidelines, pain management, urinary tract infection, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, asthma, racial disparities, African American patients, opioid prescribing, Implicit Association Test, racial stereotypes
- MeSH terms
- Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analgesics, Opioid, Asthma, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Counseling, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Pediatrics, Prejudice, Referral and Consultation, Stereotyping, Urinary Tract Infections, White People, Healthcare Disparities, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review