Cited by 548Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Life Course Perspective on How Racism May Be Related to Health Inequities

Open access
Gee, Gilbert C., Walsemann, Katrina M., Brondolo, Elizabeth·2012·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Recent studies show that racism may influence health inequities. As individuals grow from infancy into old age, they encounter social institutions that may create new exposures to racial bias. Yet, few studies have considered this idea fully. We suggest a framework that shows how racism and health inequities may be viewed from a life course perspective. It applies the ideas of age-patterned exposures, sensitive periods, linked lives, latency period, stress proliferation, historic period, and cohorts. It suggests an overarching idea that racism can structure one's time in asset-building contexts (e.g., education) or disadvantaged contexts (e.g., prison). This variation in time and exposure can contribute to racial inequities in life expectancy and other health outcomes across the life course and over generations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2012.300666

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 97 references

2 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. LaVeist TA, 1994, Health Serv Res, 29, 1
  2. Brondolo E, 2012, J Soc Issues
  3. 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50070-5 · DOI
  4. Brave Heart M, 1998, Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res, 8, 56
  5. Oliver ML, 1997, Black Wealth, White Wealth: A New Perspective on Inequality

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–548 of 548

Metadata

Authors
Gee, G. C., Walsemann, K. M., & Brondolo, E.
Affiliations
St. John's University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2012-05
Volume
102
Issue
5
Pages
967-974
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2074565935
Cited by
547
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
FWCI
66.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD041022)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
racism, health disparities, life course perspective, racial bias, sensitive period, linked lives, latency period, historical periods, cohort, asset building, disadvantaged contexts, life expectancy
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Humans, Prejudice, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review