Cited by 132Dental Health and Care UtilizationFluoride Effects and RemovalOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Water Fluoridation and the Association of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption and Dental Caries in Australian Children

Open access
Armfield, Jason M., Spencer, A. John, Roberts-Thomson, Kaye F., Plastow, Katrina·2013·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We examined demographic and socioeconomic differences in the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), its association with dental caries in children, and whether exposure to water fluoridation modifies this association. Methods. In a cross-sectional study, we used a stratified, clustered sampling design to obtain information on 16 508 children aged 5 to 16 years enrolled in Australian school dental services in 2002 to 2005. Dental staff assessed dental caries, and parents completed a questionnaire about their child’s residential history, sources of drinking water, toothbrushing frequency, socioeconomic status (SES), and SSB consumption. Results. Children who brushed their teeth less often and were older, male, of low SES, from rural or remote areas consumed significantly more SSBs. Caries was significantly associated with greater SSB consumption after controlling for potential confounders. Finally, greater exposure to fluoridated water significantly reduced the association between children’s SSB consumption and dental caries. Conclusions. Consumption of SSBs should be considered a major risk factor for dental caries. However, increased exposure to fluoridated public water helped ameliorate the association between SSB consumption and dental decay. These results reconfirm the benefits of community water fluoridation for oral health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2012.300889

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armfield, J. M., Spencer, A. J., Roberts-Thomson, K. F., & Plastow, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Jason M. Armfield, A. John Spencer, Kaye F. Roberts-Thomson, and Katrina Plastow are with the Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2013-03
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
494-500
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2158277522
Cited by
132
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
16.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
water fluoridation, sugar-sweetened beverages, dental caries, children, socioeconomic status, toothbrushing frequency, oral health, school dental care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Beverages, Carbonated Beverages, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dental Caries, Female, Fluoridation, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Dietary Sucrose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review