Cited by 750Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and DietSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Measurement of dietary intake in children

Open access
Livingstone, M. B. E., Robson, P. J.·2000·Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

Abstract

When children and adolescents are the target population in dietary surveys many different respondent and observer considerations surface. The cognitive abilities required to self-report food intake include an adequately developed concept of time, a good memory and attention span, and a knowledge of the names of foods. From the age of 8 years there is a rapid increase in the ability of children to self-report food intake. However, while cognitive abilities should be fully developed by adolescence, issues of motivation and body image may hinder willingness to report. Ten validation studies of energy intake data have demonstrated that mis-reporting, usually in the direction of under-reporting, is likely. Patterns of under-reporting vary with age, and are influenced by weight status and the dietary survey method used. Furthermore, evidence for the existence of subject-specific responding in dietary assessment challenges the assumption that repeated measurements of dietary intake will eventually obtain valid data. Unfortunately, the ability to detect mis-reporters, by comparison with presumed energy requirements, is limited unless detailed activity information is available to allow the energy intake of each subject to be evaluated individually. In addition, high variability in nutrient intakes implies that, if intakes are valid, prolonged dietary recording will be required to rank children correctly for distribution analysis. Future research should focus on refining dietary survey methods to make them more sensitive to different ages and cognitive abilities. The development of improved techniques for identification of mis-reporters and investigation of the issue of differential reporting of foods should also be given priority.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0029665100000318

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Achterberg C, Pugh MA, Collins S, Getty VM & Shannon B (1991) Feasibility of telephone interviews to collect dietary recall information from children. Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association 54, 226-228.
  2. Black AE (1997) Under-reporting of energy intake at all levels of energy expenditure: evidence from doubly labelled water studies. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 56, 121A
  3. Black AE (1999) Dietary energy intake measurements: validations against energy expenditure. DPhil Thesis, University of Ulster.
  4. Collins ME (1991) Body figure perceptions and preferences among preadolescent children. International Journal of Eating Disorders 10, 199-208.
  5. Emmons L & Hayes M (1973) Accuracy of 24-hr. recalls of young children. Journal of American Dietetic Association 62, 409-415.
  6. Van Strien T, Frijters JER, Bergers GPA & Defares PB (1986) Dutch eating behaviour questionnaire for assessment of restrained, emotional and external eating behaviour. Inter- national Journal of Eating Disorders 5, 295-315.
  7. Young CM, Chalmers FW, Church HN, Clayton MM, Hagan GC, Steele BF, Tucker RE & Foster WD (1952) Subject's ability to estimate food portions. Massachusetts Experimental Station Bulletin 469, 63-77.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livingstone, M. B. E., & Robson, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Livingstone, M. B. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Published
2000-05
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
279-293
ISSN
  • 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2719
OpenAlex
W2160178741
Cited by
750
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 51
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
dietary assessment, children, adolescents, energy intake underreporting, validation studies, energy requirements, cognitive development, body image, distribution analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Energy Intake, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Diet Surveys, Eating, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Mental Recall, Reproducibility of Results, Diet Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review