The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time
Open accessAbstract
We provided a synthesis of use, summarized key issues in applying, and highlighted exemplary applications in the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. We articulated key RE-AIM criteria by reviewing the published literature from 1999 to 2010 in several databases to describe the application and reporting on various RE-AIM dimensions. After excluding nonempirical articles, case studies, and commentaries, 71 articles were identified. The most frequent publications were on physical activity, obesity, and disease management. Four articles reported solely on 1 dimension compared with 44 articles that reported on all 5 dimensions of the framework. RE-AIM was broadly applied, but several criteria were not reported consistently.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Literature reviews on the applications of popular implementation frameworks, such as the RE-AIM and the CFIR, have enabled their advancement in implementation science.”
From The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These reviews have described and assessed the application of the RE-AIM, enabling its advancement (e.g., the enhanced RE-AIM/Pragmatic Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) 2019) and novel applications, such as combining the RE-AIM with the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) model [14,15].”
From The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The applications of popular implementation theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs), such as the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), have been well documented in the literature.”
From The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, several literature reviews have been written on the RE-AIM since its inception in 1999 [14,15].”
From The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“According to the RE-AIM evaluation,21 during this pilot process evaluation, our pathway presented a moderate reach, with moderate to high acceptance rates.”
From Implementing a PROACTive Care Pathway to Empower and Support Survivors of Breast Cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice
(1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-4-350_1 · Cited by 13,232
An ecological perspective on health promotion programs
McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818801500401 · Cited by 8,502
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322 · Cited by 7,217
Self-citationGreen, L. W., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278705284445 · Cited by 922
Self-citationGlasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Bull, S. S., & Estabrooks, P. (2004) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2 · Cited by 635
Self-citationA Proposal to Speed Translation of Healthcare Research Into Practice
Kessler, R., & Glasgow, R. E. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.023 · Cited by 376
Self-citationKlesges, L. M., Estabrooks, P. A., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Bull, S. S., & Glasgow, R. E. (2005) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_10 · Cited by 325
Self-citationWhat Does It Mean to “Employ” the RE-AIM Model?
Kessler, R. S., Purcell, E. P., Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Benkeser, R. M., & Peek, C. J. (2012) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278712446066 · Cited by 292
Self-citationToobert, D. J., Glasgow, R. E., Strycker, L. A., Barrera, M., Ritzwoller, D. P., & Weidner, G. (2007) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-4-1 · Cited by 255
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Green LW, 2005, Health Program and Planning: An Educational and Ecolgocial Approach
- Glasgow RE, Transl Behav Med
- Glasgow RE, 2006, Am J Manag Care, 12, 137
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
Glasgow, R. E., Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Rabin, B., Smith, M. L., Porter, G. C., Ory, M. G., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 · Cited by 2,528
Self-citationSmith, J. D., Li, D. H., & Rafferty, M. R. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01041-8 · Cited by 766
Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources
Holtrop, J. S., Estabrooks, P. A., Gaglio, B., Harden, S. M., Kessler, R. S., King, D. K., Kwan, B. M., Ory, M. G., Rabin, B. A., Shelton, R. C., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2021.789 · Cited by 549
Self-citationBirken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Shea, C. M., Haines, E. R., Alexis Kirk, M., Leeman, J., Rohweder, C., Damschroder, L., & Presseau, J. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y · Cited by 471
Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods
Holtrop, J. S., Rabin, B. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-2938-8 · Cited by 404
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaglio, B., Shoup, J. A., & Glasgow, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e38-e46
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- PMC
- PMC3698732
- OpenAlex
- W2028764578
- Cited by
- 1,029
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Research Board
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- RE-AIM framework, implementation research, REACH regulation, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance, physical activity interventions, obesity intervention, reporting consistency
- MeSH terms
- Health Promotion, Humans, Program Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
