Cited by 141Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Suicide Rates and State Laws Regulating Access and Exposure to Handguns

Open access
Anestis, Michael D., Anestis, Joye C.·2015·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. Using previous research, we examined the impact of 4 handgun laws (waiting periods, universal background checks, gun locks, and open carrying regulations) on suicide rates. Methods. We used publicly available databases to collect information on statewide laws, suicide rates, and demographic characteristics for 2013. Results. Each law was associated with significantly lower firearm suicide rates and the proportion of suicides resulting from firearms. In addition, each law, except for that which required a waiting period, was associated with a lower overall suicide rate. Follow-up analyses showed a significant indirect effect on overall suicide rates through the proportion of suicides by firearms, indicating that the reduced overall suicide rate was attributable to fewer suicide attempts, fewer handguns in the home, suicide attempts using less lethal means, or a combination of these factors. States that implemented any of these laws saw a decreased suicide rate in subsequent years, whereas the only state that repealed 1 of these laws saw an increased suicide rate. Conclusions. Our results were supportive of a potentially vital role in suicide prevention for state legislation that limits access and exposure to handguns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2015.302753

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between gun restrictions and lower suicide rates was confirmed in trends in four states that implemented restrictive firearm legislation during 2009-2013.

    “The latter observation has been confirmed in trends in four states that implemented restrictive changes in firearm legislation during the 2009–2013 period.59”

    From Suicide (2020) · cites this paper as [59]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anestis, M. D., & Anestis, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2015-10
Volume
105
Issue
10
Pages
2049-2058
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1717199461
Cited by
141
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3
FWCI
20.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
firearm suicide, suicide rates, gun control laws, waiting period, universal background checks, firearm access, suicide prevention, state legislation
MeSH terms
Female, Firearms, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review