Cited by 70Reproductive Health and ContraceptionMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSocial Media in Health Education

An mHealth SMS intervention on postpartum contraceptive use among women and couples in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Harrington, Elizabeth K., Drake, Alison L., Matemo, Daniel, Ronen, Keshet, Osoti, Alfred O., John-Stewart, Grace, Kinuthia, John, Unger, Jennifer A.·2019·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. To assess the effect of 2-way short message service (SMS) with a nurse on postpartum contraceptive use among individual women and couples. Methods. From 2016 to 2017, we conducted a randomized controlled trial at 2 public hospitals in western Kenya. We assigned eligible pregnant women to receive 2-way SMS with a nurse or no SMS, with the option to include male partners. We delivered automated family planning-focused SMS messages weekly until 6 months postpartum. Women and men receiving SMS could interact with nurses via SMS. In intention-to-treat analysis, we compared highly effective contraceptive (HEC) use at 6 months postpartum between groups using the χ 2 test. We used Poisson regression in adjusted analysis. Results. We randomized 260 women to 2-way SMS or control, and we enrolled 103 male partners. At 6 months postpartum, 69.9% women receiving SMS reported HEC use, compared with 57.4% in control (relative risk = 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.47; P = .04). In analysis adjusted for baseline demographic differences, the adjusted relative risk for HEC use in the SMS group was 1.26 (95% CI = 1.04, 1.52; P = .02). Conclusions. Two-way SMS with a nurse, including optional male participation, increased postpartum contraceptive use. Trial Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT02781714.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2019.305051

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrington, E. K., Drake, A. L., Matemo, D., Ronen, K., Osoti, A. O., John-Stewart, G., Kinuthia, J., & Unger, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Nairobi (KE)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2019-06
Volume
109
Issue
6
Pages
934-941
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2944034810
Cited by
70
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Society of Family Planning
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K01AI116298, P30AI027757)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
postpartum contraceptive use, mobile health, text messaging intervention, family planning, male partner involvement, postpartum period, Kenya
MeSH terms
Adult, Contraception Behavior, Female, Hospitals, Public, Humans, Kenya, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Telemedicine, Postpartum Period, Young Adult, Self Report, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review