The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why?
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The decline in death rates from cervical cancer in the United States has been widely attributed to the use of Papanicolaou (Pap) smears for early detection of cervical cancer. METHODS: Pap smear screening rates, beliefs about appropriate screening intervals and factors affecting screening were examined using 1987 National Health Interview Survey data. RESULTS: Results indicate that through age 69, Blacks are screened at similar or higher rates than Whites. Hispanics, particularly those speaking only or mostly Spanish, are least likely to have received a Pap smear within the last three years. Of women who had never heard of or never had a Pap smear, nearly 80 percent reported contact with a medical practitioner in the past two years, while more than 90 percent reported a contact in the past five years. Overall, the most frequently reported reason for not having a recent Pap smear was procrastinating or not believing it was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, in developing screening programs, Hispanics, particularly Spanish speakers, must be targeted. In addition, educational programs should target unscreened women who forego the test due to underestimating its importance, procrastination, or because their medical care provider did not suggest the procedure. Women must be intensively educated that Pap smears should be scheduled routinely to detect asymptomatic cervical cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Equity of access to health care services:
Goddard, M., & Smith, P. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00415-9 · Cited by 667
Johnson, C. E., Mues, K. E., Mayne, S. L., & Kiblawi, A. N. (2008) · Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease · doi:10.1097/lgt.0b013e31815d8d88 · Cited by 310
Current status of human papillomavirus vaccination in India's cervical cancer prevention efforts
Sankaranarayanan, R., Basu, P., Kaur, P., Bhaskar, R., Singh, G. B., Denzongpa, P., Grover, R. K., Sebastian, P., Saikia, T., Oswal, K., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30531-5 · Cited by 136
Health outcomes assessment in vulnerable populations: measurement challenges and recommendations
Hahn, E. A., & Cella, D. (2003) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50245 · Cited by 133
Kwok, C., White, K., & Roydhouse, J. K. (2011) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-011-9491-4 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Harlan, L. C., Bernstein, A. B., & Kessler, L. G.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 885-890
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2099888955
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.81.7.885
- The paper
- Harlan, L. C., Bernstein, A. B., & Kessler, L. G. (1991). Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why? American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.81.7.885
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.